Org Mobile Site
Thread: What's better, BI or RTR?
I'm just wrapping up a very enjoyable campaign as the Alemmani (BI, 1.6) and was wondering if it'd be worth it to try RTR.
Is RTR better than BI? By better, I mean, more enjoyable.
I understand that I'd have to patch "down" for RTR, to 1.2? That sounds like a bad idea to me.
Thanks for the input!
Is RTR better than BI? By better, I mean, more enjoyable.
I understand that I'd have to patch "down" for RTR, to 1.2? That sounds like a bad idea to me.
Thanks for the input!
Get EB. It has much more content than RTR, and the best thing is that it is the only the beta.
Yes, definitely try RTR. At heart, of course, it is just RTW - so it has a much bigger campaign than BI with very different units. But it improves on it in a number of ways.
The units are the most obvious - they are more authentic and just "feel" more right to me. The stats have been adjusted to make the relative arms somewhat like BI - missiles and cavalry are much weaker than RTW (and even BI), which I think is historical. Plus morale has been pumped up to make battles last longer.
At the campaign level, unit recruitment has been altered so that it takes longer to get your own units in occupied provinces. Naval combat has been made much more decisive. The economy has been tightened up. And the map redrawn to be more historical (Rome is unified with only 3 starting provinces).
Yes, you do have to work with 1.2. I just have a dual install (actually triple - one for EB as well).
EB is also worth trying - it does similar things to RTR but I agree has more content. Unfortunately, it crashed so much on my rig that it became unplayable.
The units are the most obvious - they are more authentic and just "feel" more right to me. The stats have been adjusted to make the relative arms somewhat like BI - missiles and cavalry are much weaker than RTW (and even BI), which I think is historical. Plus morale has been pumped up to make battles last longer.
At the campaign level, unit recruitment has been altered so that it takes longer to get your own units in occupied provinces. Naval combat has been made much more decisive. The economy has been tightened up. And the map redrawn to be more historical (Rome is unified with only 3 starting provinces).
Yes, you do have to work with 1.2. I just have a dual install (actually triple - one for EB as well).
EB is also worth trying - it does similar things to RTR but I agree has more content. Unfortunately, it crashed so much on my rig that it became unplayable.
Originally Posted by Copperhaired Berserker!:
Get EB. It has much more content than RTR, and the best thing is that it is the only the beta.
I second this. Get EB. It has much more content than RTR, and the best thing is that it is the only the beta.
Unfortunately it is for patch 1.2 so the AI is still dumb as a rock but the features they have brings a new level to RTW.
I have no ploblems with EB.
Having tried both EB and RTR, I personally prefer RTR. EB has a lot more content, it's true, but everything is cripplingly expensive. If you want a more realistic (and much more fun) game that still plays generally like regular RTW, I'd go for RTR. I really didn't play EB much at all though, so your mileage may vary.
BI or RTR, both are worthy , though I found WRE in BI the most intersting campaign I've played so far.
I found BI a massive disappointment, it was too easy. And the historical accuracy wasn't that good either...
So I would definitely go for RTR or EB or another historical mod, much better, and they're cheaper too
So I would definitely go for RTR or EB or another historical mod, much better, and they're cheaper too
BI definately, RTR and EB are crap and shouldn't have been released at all.
Originally Posted by lars573:
BI definately, RTR and EB are crap and shouldn't have been released at all.
It might be helpful if you explained why you disliked them. Especially given that so many poster seem to disagree with you.BI definately, RTR and EB are crap and shouldn't have been released at all.
RTR is being converted to be in use with the BI engine. So hopefully very shortly they will have a BI working version of RTR.
I kid you not, the only reason that I purchased BI is because RTR 7 is going to require it.
EB & RTR both make big improvements on the base game.
Personally I found EB open beta too buggy/incomplete to play much at the moment.
RTR 6 gold is what I play in the meantime (with Trajans SigniferOnes animations mod & a few tweaks of my own).
EB & RTR both make big improvements on the base game.
Personally I found EB open beta too buggy/incomplete to play much at the moment.
RTR 6 gold is what I play in the meantime (with Trajans SigniferOnes animations mod & a few tweaks of my own).
Originally Posted by Ludens:
It might be helpful if you explained why you disliked them. Especially given that so many poster seem to disagree with you.
RTR has nothing about that makes it worth playing. Creative text editing could do half of what RTR does. All the historical "accuracy" none of the BS. It might be helpful if you explained why you disliked them. Especially given that so many poster seem to disagree with you.
And EB well the balls-to-the-wall arrogance displayed by that group is gag inducing. Their whole we know better than CA and are going to put out a mod that looks like crap (litterally given the colours palette they use) to prove how much we know and how great we are attitude.
But what bothers me most is that they all want to make RTW more like MTW (
). MTW was the weakest TW and nothing about it's game play should ever be attempted again.Originally Posted by lars573:
RTR has nothing about that makes it worth playing. Creative text editing could do half of what RTR does. All the historical "accuracy" none of the BS.
And EB well the balls-to-the-wall arrogance displayed by that group is gag inducing. Their whole we know better than CA and are going to put out a mod that looks like crap (litterally given the colours palette they use) to prove how much we know and how great we are attitude.
But what bothers me most is that they all want to make RTW more like MTW ( ). MTW was the weakest TW and nothing about it's game play should ever be attempted again.
in YOUR opinion...RTR has nothing about that makes it worth playing. Creative text editing could do half of what RTR does. All the historical "accuracy" none of the BS.
And EB well the balls-to-the-wall arrogance displayed by that group is gag inducing. Their whole we know better than CA and are going to put out a mod that looks like crap (litterally given the colours palette they use) to prove how much we know and how great we are attitude.
But what bothers me most is that they all want to make RTW more like MTW (
). MTW was the weakest TW and nothing about it's game play should ever be attempted again.Just an observation...
Hellenes
Originally Posted by lars573:
RTR has nothing about that makes it worth playing. Creative text editing could do half of what RTR does. All the historical "accuracy" none of the BS.
And EB well the balls-to-the-wall arrogance displayed by that group is gag inducing. Their whole we know better than CA and are going to put out a mod that looks like crap (litterally given the colours palette they use) to prove how much we know and how great we are attitude.
But what bothers me most is that they all want to make RTW more like MTW ( ). MTW was the weakest TW and nothing about it's game play should ever be attempted again.
What is this anyway?RTR has nothing about that makes it worth playing. Creative text editing could do half of what RTR does. All the historical "accuracy" none of the BS.
And EB well the balls-to-the-wall arrogance displayed by that group is gag inducing. Their whole we know better than CA and are going to put out a mod that looks like crap (litterally given the colours palette they use) to prove how much we know and how great we are attitude.
But what bothers me most is that they all want to make RTW more like MTW (
). MTW was the weakest TW and nothing about it's game play should ever be attempted again.I have played RTR since its first build and if you see the amount of work you wouldn't claim that RTR was an amateur project. RTR was the first people who came up with the the Area of Recruitment (actually implemented it), created the Spain to India sized map and they created many new and different units. They were also willing to take on other mods into their own which I think requires a good deal of humility and compromise.
As for EB, 'walls to the balls arrogance' was deserved on their part. Never have I seen such pinpoint detail that is lacking in the Total War Series. On top of that little things like the trait systems overhaul (not really a small thing), the new method of buildings and recruitment, the random quests, weather movement restrictions and the new unique buildings.
EB deserves the arrogance they people perceive them to have (although personally I think they are pretty cool about what they have done). They have created mind-blowing mods and deserve to be congratulated, FACT. My experience with both is that RTR was great but just had too many cities (Seige:Total War got boring to fast) and EB needs to fix their faction expansion and the crashes
. However that said they were both great mods and do not deserve your uneducated and unsubstantiated criticism, especially to the people who did really put work into those mods.Lastly, given that MTW's (and even more so STW's) gameplay has been largely mythologised by the older TW players but it was still a good deal harder than RTW (generals running into phalanx's anyone). For one you could actually lose on MTW if you were playing on expert and on top of that the autoresolve button actually worked. If MTW was really so bad why do many people still play it from time to time.
I have an idea my friend, why don't you mind your words when you for one could not even come with a mod of even marginal value compared to the RTR and EB modders.
I like RTR for its single player pace against AI, I like BI for its multi-player pace and balance. The multiplayer pace for RTR is just not right.
While he's no diplomat, don't take offense from Lars' words. He has strong opinions, sometimes doesn't explain them thoroughly, and writes in a rather brusk manner. I'm not under the impression he's trying to ruffle anyone's feathers.
lars, didn't you know how much you were going to get criticised for saying that? Not saying that you are wrong (although I disagree about EB and MTW) but this society has developed in such a way that if you want to criticise a mod that someone has made, you are GOING to protested.
Originally Posted by Silver Rusher:
...this society has developed in such a way that if you want to criticise a mod that someone has made, you are GOING to protested.
That's a conscious decision here - we treat mod makers (and CA) as Org members - they usually are - and members are supposed to treat each other with respect. It is just plain rude to insult someone else's work. Criticism in neutral language is ok - constructive criticism is valuable - but using offensive language to denigrate other people's work is not acceptable....this society has developed in such a way that if you want to criticise a mod that someone has made, you are GOING to protested.
Originally Posted by Aetius the Last Roman:
What is this anyway?
I have played RTR since its first build and if you see the amount of work you wouldn't claim that RTR was an amateur project. RTR was the first people who came up with the the Area of Recruitment (actually implemented it), created the Spain to India sized map and they created many new and different units. They were also willing to take on other mods into their own which I think requires a good deal of humility and compromise.
It is an amateur project. AoR is horrible idea and should have been rejected out hand with out ever being considered.What is this anyway?
I have played RTR since its first build and if you see the amount of work you wouldn't claim that RTR was an amateur project. RTR was the first people who came up with the the Area of Recruitment (actually implemented it), created the Spain to India sized map and they created many new and different units. They were also willing to take on other mods into their own which I think requires a good deal of humility and compromise.
Originally Posted by Aetius the Last Roman:
As for EB, 'walls to the balls arrogance' was deserved on their part. Never have I seen such pinpoint detail that is lacking in the Total War Series. On top of that little things like the trait systems overhaul (not really a small thing), the new method of buildings and recruitment, the random quests, weather movement restrictions and the new unique buildings.
No it's not deserved. All they did was make RTW unplayable. If RTW had been like EB or RTR out of the box it would have failed so bably it would have been painful to watch. I would have returned it to the store and hoped CA would do better next time.As for EB, 'walls to the balls arrogance' was deserved on their part. Never have I seen such pinpoint detail that is lacking in the Total War Series. On top of that little things like the trait systems overhaul (not really a small thing), the new method of buildings and recruitment, the random quests, weather movement restrictions and the new unique buildings.
Originally Posted by Aetius the Last Roman:
EB deserves the arrogance they people perceive them to have (although personally I think they are pretty cool about what they have done). They have created mind-blowing mods and deserve to be congratulated, FACT. My experience with both is that RTR was great but just had too many cities (Seige:Total War got boring to fast) and EB needs to fix their faction expansion and the crashes. However that said they were both great mods and do not deserve your uneducated and unsubstantiated criticism, especially to the people who did really put work into those mods.
I go by what I see and hear. I've vowed never to play either RTR or EB. And all I see and hear are bad ideas poorly executed. Uneducated ha!EB deserves the arrogance they people perceive them to have (although personally I think they are pretty cool about what they have done). They have created mind-blowing mods and deserve to be congratulated, FACT. My experience with both is that RTR was great but just had too many cities (Seige:Total War got boring to fast) and EB needs to fix their faction expansion and the crashes
. However that said they were both great mods and do not deserve your uneducated and unsubstantiated criticism, especially to the people who did really put work into those mods.Originally Posted by Aetius the Last Roman:
Lastly, given that MTW's (and even more so STW's) gameplay has been largely mythologised by the older TW players but it was still a good deal harder than RTW (generals running into phalanx's anyone). For one you could actually lose on MTW if you were playing on expert and on top of that the autoresolve button actually worked. If MTW was really so bad why do many people still play it from time to time.
People still play it because they are incapapble of changing their play style to the more advanced RTW system. You can't play every single game the same way, and you can't expect to either.Lastly, given that MTW's (and even more so STW's) gameplay has been largely mythologised by the older TW players but it was still a good deal harder than RTW (generals running into phalanx's anyone). For one you could actually lose on MTW if you were playing on expert and on top of that the autoresolve button actually worked. If MTW was really so bad why do many people still play it from time to time.
Originally Posted by Aetius the Last Roman:
I have an idea my friend, why don't you mind your words when you for one could not even come with a mod of even marginal value compared to the RTR and EB modders.
How about no. How about I say what I think and you stop tyring to mount your high horse.I have an idea my friend, why don't you mind your words when you for one could not even come with a mod of even marginal value compared to the RTR and EB modders.
Originally Posted by Silver Rusher:
lars, didn't you know how much you were going to get criticised for saying that? Not saying that you are wrong (although I disagree about EB and MTW) but this society has developed in such a way that if you want to criticise a mod that someone has made, you are GOING to protested.
Yes, but I had to say it. Aswell others are aloud to moan about regular RTW. So I should be able to do the same about these turds if I want.lars, didn't you know how much you were going to get criticised for saying that? Not saying that you are wrong (although I disagree about EB and MTW) but this society has developed in such a way that if you want to criticise a mod that someone has made, you are GOING to protested.
Originally Posted by Simon Appleton:
That's a conscious decision here - we treat mod makers (and CA) as Org members - they usually are - and members are supposed to treat each other with respect. It is just plain rude to insult someone else's work. Criticism in neutral language is ok - constructive criticism is valuable - but using offensive language to denigrate other people's work is not acceptable.
If they were willing to accept anything aproaching constructive criticism I'd try. They only want praise, and bug fixes for their wastes of time.That's a conscious decision here - we treat mod makers (and CA) as Org members - they usually are - and members are supposed to treat each other with respect. It is just plain rude to insult someone else's work. Criticism in neutral language is ok - constructive criticism is valuable - but using offensive language to denigrate other people's work is not acceptable.
Originally Posted by lars573:
It is an amateur project. AoR is horrible idea and should have been rejected out hand with out ever being considered.
No it's not deserved. All they did was make RTW unplayable. If RTW had been like EB or RTR out of the box it would have failed so bably it would have been painful to watch. I would have returned it to the store and hoped CA would do better next time.
I go by what I see and hear. I've vowed never to play either RTR or EB. And all I see and hear are bad ideas poorly executed. Uneducated ha!
People still play it because they are incapapble of changing their play style to the more advanced RTW system. You can't play every single game the same way, and you can't expect to either.
How about no. How about I say what I think and you stop tyring to mount your high horse.
Yes, but I had to say it. Aswell others are aloud to moan about regular RTW. So I should be able to do the same about these turds if I want.
If they were willing to accept anything aproaching constructive criticism I'd try. They only want praise, and bug fixes for their wastes of time.
1000000 sales of MTW and 100000 downloads of RTR pretty much diminish the whole point in this argument.It is an amateur project. AoR is horrible idea and should have been rejected out hand with out ever being considered.
No it's not deserved. All they did was make RTW unplayable. If RTW had been like EB or RTR out of the box it would have failed so bably it would have been painful to watch. I would have returned it to the store and hoped CA would do better next time.
I go by what I see and hear. I've vowed never to play either RTR or EB. And all I see and hear are bad ideas poorly executed. Uneducated ha!
People still play it because they are incapapble of changing their play style to the more advanced RTW system. You can't play every single game the same way, and you can't expect to either.
How about no. How about I say what I think and you stop tyring to mount your high horse.
Yes, but I had to say it. Aswell others are aloud to moan about regular RTW. So I should be able to do the same about these turds if I want.
If they were willing to accept anything aproaching constructive criticism I'd try. They only want praise, and bug fixes for their wastes of time.
Hellenes
Originally Posted by hellenes:
1000000 sales of MTW and 100000 downloads of RTR pretty much diminish the whole point in this argument.
Hellenes
I didn't say I don't have MTW just that is pales compared to RTW. Also 100000 dl's of RTR LOL!!! In your, and their, dreams.1000000 sales of MTW and 100000 downloads of RTR pretty much diminish the whole point in this argument.
Hellenes
Originally Posted by lars573:
I didn't say I don't have MTW just that is pales compared to RTW. Also 100000 dl's of RTR LOL!!! In your, and their, dreams.
You are self inflicting blows on your credibility....RTR had 100000 downloads on first few days of release of 6.0...I didn't say I don't have MTW just that is pales compared to RTW. Also 100000 dl's of RTR LOL!!! In your, and their, dreams.
I might disagree with the RTR team on the number of cities and other aspects but I only critisize them with points that I dont like and with suggestions how to improve/change things, and if I really want something to change Ill do my best presenting ARGUMENTS (spelling A R G U M E N T S) and convincing the team...eg http://forums.rometotalrealism.org/i...opic=10508&hl=
Its your right and opinion to adore dumbing down process and favour a more casual and relaxed stance towards the game, but you have to know that not all people have the same preferences as you and that YOUR definition of "fun" isnt a universal standard...
Hellenes
Basically BI is faster then RTR smaller map less units
RTR slows the game down, so you cant conquer the world in the first 30 turns and adds a variety of new units.
If your looking for a challenge go to RTR.
RTR slows the game down, so you cant conquer the world in the first 30 turns and adds a variety of new units.
If your looking for a challenge go to RTR.
Originally Posted by lars573:
No it's not deserved. All they did was make RTW unplayable. If RTW had been like EB or RTR out of the box it would have failed so bably it would have been painful to watch. I would have returned it to the store and hoped CA would do better next time.
I disagree.No it's not deserved. All they did was make RTW unplayable. If RTW had been like EB or RTR out of the box it would have failed so bably it would have been painful to watch. I would have returned it to the store and hoped CA would do better next time.
If RTW was like RTR then yes the game would have been boring beyond belief but if RTW would have been like EB then it wouldn't have failed.
EB team has done amazing things with the game and the mod is still at a beta status. Once they have sorted out the CTDs and various other problems the mod will be the greatest ever.
EB is probably the most challenging mod(next to Darthmod) there is at the moment and that is always great
I doubt that. EB looks horrible. And most of what I've heard about the game play is not inspiring.
You cant really judge EB right now its no were close to what a finished product will look like
Originally Posted by Destroyer of Hope:
You cant really judge EB right now its no were close to what a finished product will look like
Watch me. I decided it would suck 7 months ago. And added to my never play by choice unless paid extravagent sums of cash list.You cant really judge EB right now its no were close to what a finished product will look like
You should try it .
The units for the celtic factions looks amazing.
But it's a beta so the mod isn't complete but still it beats other mods that are complete.
The units for the celtic factions looks amazing.
But it's a beta so the mod isn't complete but still it beats other mods that are complete.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO