Europa Barbarorum is a stunning achievement even in its beta form and the info that I have gleaned from lurking on the forum makes the future of the Mod look more promising still, but there is one glaring anachronism- the use of the BC/AD nomenclature for the date. Even the Christians didn't start using 'anno Domini' until the 5th century or so and it didn't become universal for a long time ( Portugal in 1422, for example). Certainly the Greeks and Romans were not counting down to the birth of Jesus.
They had their own system(s). It would make the immersion in the history of the period even better if the dates corresponded to the faction that you were playing.
The Greeks/Diadachoi used many different calendars for naming days, months and years but they all would have been at least aware of the Olympiad-
so the Hellenic factions (5 factions at least, 6 if you include Pontus) could use this system of dating. The year 272 BC would have been (I think) "The Year of the 126th Olympiad". Years between the Olympic games could be "The 2nd Year of the 126th Olympiad" etc.
Let's be realistic- there's not enough room where the date is now to say all of that but an acceptable abbreviated form would not be hard to find- 126/2 for
271 BC, 126/3 for 270 BC and so on.
For the Romans, it's pretty easy. They dated by the names of the Consuls of the year in question, and fortunately (thanks to Varro and Livy) we have a full list of the consuls for the entire period of RTW:EB!
Thus the year 272 BC is "The Year of the Second Consulship of Lucius Papirius Cursor and Spurius Carvilius Maximus"
As in the case of the Greeks, there simply isn't enough room for all of that, but maybe an advisor could pop up every four turns and announce the appropriate consuls. And since the Romans also counted up from the legendary foundation of Rome and called it 'Ad Urbi Condita', instead of 272 BC we could have AUC 482 and count up from there. That would be way cool.
Caveat- In fact, the AUC style of dating was probably not popularised until the reign of the Emporer Claudius- but that would be a heck of a lot less anachronistic than dating by the birth of christ!
For the Barbarian factions the situation is more difficult- many of them would probably have used the dating system of the closest superpower insofar as the cared about naming the years at all. Some may have used 'Regnal years', i.e. 'The first year of the reign of King Jimmy (whoever)'. And the Carthaginians are another kettle of fish altogether. The Parthians might have used a Chaldean or Babylonian calendar. All this would have to be looked into. Still, anybody think it's a good idea?
.
Bookmarks