Ah, then I guess we cannot continue our debate, pleasant and unoffensive as it may. For we have two underlying different warrants -- assumptions. Yours is the view that only look at Satan from a Christian perspective. Me, I look at them, as A. Saturnus stated, from the Satanists' point of view, in which, in and of itself, there are many. Occultists, moral relativists, satirists, noncomformists, and so on.Originally Posted by Wigferth Ironwall
That clarifies enough, then. Even Loki himself is relative.Originally Posted by Wigferth Ironwall
![]()
Ah, but I look at Goths from the only perspective physically available for me, the American High School one. I know there are "Goths" in many age groups but the high school one is, more often than not, what the stereotype is.Originally Posted by A. Saturnus
The word "Satan" by modern understanding is varied, and what Christianity contributes to the societal perspective of things does not necessarily mean Christianity owns it and that what it was is now what it is. "Satan" might be a concept, at least in the West, derived originally from the religion(s), but as the concept evolved its purpose changed, at least among those who "change" with it, such as Lavey's point of view. It becomes, in many "atheistic" Satanists' mind, just a single word that unites many concepts such as the libertarian principle, moral relativism, and self-centered ego, thus suitable to be used as an "idol," with or without the intention of making a connotation to the Biblical Satan, or just pissing off Christians. Like I said above, in this post, our underlying warrants are different.Originally Posted by Husar
Bookmarks