Maybe I like the Commodore better :) , but seriously, I just like MTW better in every way except graphics. And even then I think they are still good.Originally Posted by lars573
Maybe I like the Commodore better :) , but seriously, I just like MTW better in every way except graphics. And even then I think they are still good.Originally Posted by lars573
In anyone who wants a better games opinion.
The difference between 2D and 3D, the difference between digital and ananlouge. The MTW map was 2D and digital (yes/no on/off), as compared to the 3D analogue (many degrees between yes/no on/off) map in RTW. In MTW you moved armies/agents on rails practically. You picked it up in province A and dropped it in province B. You could move an army from Egypt to Norway in one move if you had all the sea areas (oceans were divided up into areas of control) controlled. You could move an agent anywhere on the map that had a port in 1 turn. When you invaded a province the battle happened automatically the next turn. You couldn't evade them lead them around with 1 or 2 units. You could only move 1 province in 1 turn. I could go on. But lets just say that the MTW map to RTW's map is like a commodore 64 compared to a modern PC.
Women's English
Yes = No
No = Yes
Maybe = No
We need = I want
We need to talk = I need to complain
You're ... so manly = You need a shave and you sweat a lot
You're certainly attentive tonight = Is sex all you ever think about?
This kitchen is so inconvenient = I want a new house
Bookmarks