Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Chivalric Sergeants

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Philologist Senior Member ajaxfetish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    The best use by far for any spear unit in any period is as an 'anvil,' and chivalric sergeants continue to field that role better than polearms. The large unit size means they can cover a larger front, and with rank bonuses they can hold on defensively for a long time and are very hard to push back.

    They continue to be the best troops for holding a line, and they're cheaper per man to build and maintain than any polearm unit, so great for when money is tight or you need more bulk to your army. But with the advent of decent polearms they are no longer strictly necessary. They don't become useless or excessively limited, but they do become optional. Depending on your preferences as a commander, you can keep them or organize an army without them.

    Ajax

    "I do not yet know how chivalry will fare in these calamitous times of ours." --- Don Quixote
    "I have no words, my voice is in my sword." --- Shakespeare
    "I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." --- Jack Handey

  2. #2
    Minion of Zoltan Member Roark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    961

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    Ajax is spot-on.

    If you ever need to establish a "front" just before a major clash, just get a unit of Chivalric Sargeants and plop a polearm unit behind them. These two units working in tandem can hold back pretty much anything in a melee for a really long time.

  3. #3
    Master of useless knowledge Senior Member Kitten Shooting Champion, Eskiv Champion Ironside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    And they're gods to survive arrowfire.
    We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?

    Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
    Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
    TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED

  4. #4
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    Until Arbs come around and they lose a chunk of armour protection.

    Does AP Arrow vs Chivalric Seargents make them equal to Feudals? 3-int(3/2) Armour after application and 0 Morale vs 1 Armour and 2 Morale?

    Also, does anyone regularly use Gothic Seargents?
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  5. #5
    Philologist Senior Member ajaxfetish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,132

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    I'm not sure since the AP system for ranged is different from melee. I've seen it presented a couple times, but never tried hard enough to figure out how it works. They'd suffer but still have more protection than feudals, but I'm not sure how closely that'd balance the difference in morale.

    Ajax

    "I do not yet know how chivalry will fare in these calamitous times of ours." --- Don Quixote
    "I have no words, my voice is in my sword." --- Shakespeare
    "I can picture in my mind a world without war, a world without hate. And I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it." --- Jack Handey

  6. #6
    Master of useless knowledge Senior Member Kitten Shooting Champion, Eskiv Champion Ironside's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaxfetish
    I'm not sure since the AP system for ranged is different from melee. I've seen it presented a couple times, but never tried hard enough to figure out how it works. They'd suffer but still have more protection than feudals, but I'm not sure how closely that'd balance the difference in morale.

    Ajax
    It's a simple raw modifier IIRC, 0,3 for arbs, 0,4 for crossbows and 0,5 for longbows while 1 for regular arrows.
    We are all aware that the senses can be deceived, the eyes fooled. But how can we be sure our senses are not being deceived at any particular time, or even all the time? Might I just be a brain in a tank somewhere, tricked all my life into believing in the events of this world by some insane computer? And does my life gain or lose meaning based on my reaction to such solipsism?

    Project PYRRHO, Specimen 46, Vat 7
    Activity Recorded M.Y. 2302.22467
    TERMINATION OF SPECIMEN ADVISED

  7. #7

    Default Re: Chivalric Sergeants

    Ajax is right on his use of Chivalric Sergeants, don´t go to battle without them (unless you can get Italian or Saracen Infantry, which have the same stats, but higher morale). I certainly never do. There´s nothing better than a solid wall of spears to deploy from.

    Gothic sergeant suffer two flaws, in my opinion: They come around way too late to be usefull (even if you start playing in the Late era, it´ll almost be over by the time you´ve fulfilled the building requirements, much the same goes for Gothic Knights) and they´re only 80 men, so they can´t cover the same front line Chivalrics can.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO