Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: 2.6 Ghz: any reason to upgrade ?

  1. #31
    Senior Member Senior Member Reenk Roink's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    4,353

    Default Re: 2.6 Ghz: any reason to upgrade ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Just A Girl
    You guys want me to join in here?

    cos your all right.
    your just wording your selfs wrong.
    (atleast thats what i see from what ive read so far)
    Yay! A debate .

    (I'm rooting for you ShambleS... )

  2. #32

    Default Re: 2.6 Ghz: any reason to upgrade ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
    Yay! A debate .

    (I'm rooting for you ShambleS... )

    I cant see what's to debate.
    no body has said anything hideously incorrect.
    (unless i want to be pedantic about things)

    Cache size/ tweaks. Have been a factor all along.
    But Its also become more of a selling point for cpu's these days than it used to be.
    So there you go. Every 1 is right.
    But they just didnt word it right for Some people to agree.

    So i dont see where theres a debate.
    unless you just want to be annoying and debate the littlest word being out of place.
    But that would just be petty.
    Wouldnt it orangat?
    Last edited by Just A Girl; 02-28-2006 at 01:52.

  3. #33
    zombologist Senior Member doc_bean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Riding Shai-Hulud
    Posts
    5,346

    Default Re: 2.6 Ghz: any reason to upgrade ?

    Quote Originally Posted by orangat
    Or just run a stress test program like rthdribl.
    I ran 3dmark06 and it didn't crash, maybe it's related to a special effect or to something else than my gfx card (hard to know what though...).
    Yes, Iraq is peaceful. Go to sleep now. - Adrian II

  4. #34
    Actual Person Member Paul Peru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Yurp
    Posts
    529

    Default Re: 2.6 Ghz: any reason to upgrade ?

    Getting a bit OT, sorry.
    Quote Originally Posted by CBR
    You could change the cooler to one of the Arctic Cooling NV Silencer series. I did it for both my old 5900XT and new 7800GT and they run cool and quiet.
    I had one on my 9800. Loved it. Silent, efficient, and keeping the case cool as well. My current 6800 has a solid 2 slot backplate, so I'd have to cut it to accomodate an AC solution.
    There are 2 tiny whiny fans, and nice heatsinks on both gpu and ram. I tried putting a bigger fan from an A64 stock cooler over the gpu, and it worked great for the gpu and ram, but the card became unstable due to the voltage regulators overheating. (known problem for 6800 cards) I'll need to find a way to cool that part better. Or sell it and buy a 7800 GS.

    As for the other discussion here, I think a main reason why the A64-chips kick ### is the on-chip memory controller. The importance of cache size can vary greatly between apps.
    Sono Pazzi Questi Romani
    Paul Peru: Holier than thy bucket!

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO