You're being at least as pigheaded as I am and I'm not going to debate with you if you're going to be petty and superior.
Now, just to make the situation clear, I am perfectly aware of what you're saying, and I'm trying to tell why I think another approach is better. Do you think I didn't try the obvious, intuitive approach first? We started out with a system very similar to what you're laying out, and over the course of months of testing we altered it bit by bit into what is it now.
You're being incredibly arrogant and I don't appreciate it, nothing you've done proves anything but the fact that you have a superiority complex. Using the Gaesatae as an example of unarmored troops being more well defended in melee than armored ones is just silly, they're obviously a unique situation. Also, using shield rather than defense skill makes them inaccurately vulnerable on their non-shielded side, as well as from the rear. If you drop your attitude maybe we can have a discussion not a pissing contest, but you seem to have the belief that no one else could possibly understand anything as well as you can.
Bookmarks