
Originally Posted by
Ludens
Macroi, it is off course very good to know that you enjoy the EB mod and want to make it better, but I think you should watch your tone.
I actually agree with you that, as a general rule, a shield was more use than armour, but R:TW soldiers do not optimally use it (e.g. turn to face threats) so increasing their shield bonus at the cost of armour would make them more vulnerable from the right or rear. One of the things I like about EB is that they removed this exaggareted vulnerability: real soldiers would not keep looking forward when the soldier behind them was being cut down.
Despite this, I do wonder why certain "directional" forms of armour, like the greave and the pectoralis, are not included in the shield bonus.
My two pence.
Bookmarks