You know, I was thinking this myself!Originally Posted by Kull
I think that the first post was well thought out (clearly) and had some useful points. But I think that the responses have fairly reasonably explained that the model proposed by the thread-starter had been explored, and discarded in favour of another approach. This seems fair enough to me.
However, it seems that some people have taken over this thread in an effort to ressurrect old arguments (about spear use or something, or so I gather?).
Perhaps this thread, having diverged from the original post to such a great degree, should be closed and not simply renamed?
Bookmarks