Thanks Simon ....

that is what Iposted and that made get angry the thread starters ,


I must say that from what I know , I ' have read and seen the CA reconstructions are historically quite accurate this time , I don't think there could be the need of a Realism mod as for the units , at least we could need a more nice texture pack , but units are really more accurate historically speacking than they where for rtw ....
I don't find anything insulting or bad , I just stated my opinion , beeing insulted and bad addressed just becouse of this is a sign of immaturity and childness , if people can't manage contact with who doesn't agree with you then shouldn't post in public forum , plus criticism is always constructive , and needs to be considered , it is uslesess to create a thread where he want everyone tell him all he says is correct ....
I was the first to tell that Rome TW wasn't historically accurate , but you could see this from the first screenshots , this time from the screens I saw CA made an exceptional job in terms of historical accuracy , just look for example at the turkish ottoman troops ..... knowing history is a matter of facts and not guesses .... What I said is that It is too early to say that CA made an unhistorical job ,.... even about Elephant with cannons and camels , just becouse someone doesn't knows about them doesnt mean they didn't exhisted ..... and they did , altought not with a cannon but a heavy gun .....


also posting into a forum has to be civil and you have to be able to get assaulted even and defend your opinions , answering in bad manners or behaving unpolitely is just stupid to me , especially when it is all related to a game ....