Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: uses of naphta catapults

  1. #1
    Grand Patron's Banner Bearer Senior Member Peasant Phill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somewhere relatively safe, behind some one else, preferably at the back
    Posts
    2,953
    Blog Entries
    3

    Question uses of naphta catapults

    I know such a topic is better discussed in the main hall but as I'm not allowed to post their yet, I'll have to do it here.

    I'm playing MTW right now with the XL-mod (great work viking horde) and I have the choice of building naphta catapults. I don't have a lot of cash laying around so I have to know if they are worth their money and building time.

    What I think (this is only an assumption) is that by replacing the rock with a jar of explosive chemicals you transform the catapult from an anti-building weapon to an anti-personnel weapon.

    I've read that they are great when attacking or defending a bridge because the enemy will be all bunched together or at least stationary. But this is probably its biggest flaw to: its accuracy. The crew of a normal catapult isn't able to compare, in kills, to an archer unit I could deploy in its place, not even by far. So will an explosion make more victims? This'll be the case if it hits a unit dead on, but in my experience with normal catapults this is a rare occurence. On top of that the projectile won't bounce further and by doing so decreasing the chance even more of hitting someone.
    A peculiar and well known bug (I presume it's a bug) is the ability of artillery to hit the general. This occurence will happen more often I think as the explosion (if it hits the intended spot) will take more men than a plain rock.

    On the other hand will the naphta catapult still be as effective against buildings? I reality a rock will probably do more damage against thick stone walls than some exploding chemicals. Sure they will cause wooden wall to catch fire (I assume) but wooden walls aren't exactly the reason why I use siege engines ( almost every unit can destroy wooden walls with reasonable death rate).

    So am I right in my arguments ( I haven't once used naphta catapults so if you have experience that point in an other direction please don't hesitate to reply) or not? Are there than specific situations where they achieve their full potential (like bridge battles)?

    Thanks in advance
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone
    Someone has to watch over the wheat.
    Quote Originally Posted by TinCow
    We've made our walls sufficiently thick that we don't even hear the wet thuds of them bashing their brains against the outer wall and falling as lifeless corpses into our bottomless moat.

  2. #2
    L'Etranger Senior Member Banquo's Ghost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hunting the Snark, a long way from Tipperary...
    Posts
    5,604

    Default Re: uses of naphta catapults

    Catapults of any persuasion are horribly inaccurate and when they do hit, they don't kill that many. Naptha catapults frighten the enemy to death when they hit, so morale suffers, but I have never seen them turn the tide.

    Except of course, for the general-killing bug, which I think is a little cheesy to take advantage of - and there isn't that much of a chance of hitting your enemy.

    On bridge battles, you still have the inaccuracy until the team valours up, with the added advantage of hitting our own defenders and making them run screaming.

    All in all, if you have a catapult about your person when you're invaded, it might be worth trying out. Building them specifically for open field battles is a bit of a waste - but this is only my opinion
    "If there is a sin against life, it consists not so much in despairing as in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this one."
    Albert Camus "Noces"

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO