That article smells like BS too me.
If you search for "IED Iraq" in Google video, you get several hits that actually show clips of IED explosions. Im not sure if the one the author is whining about actually shows up or not, but it'd be pretty lousy censorship to censor one safe IED detonation and leave several others.The US media's reluctance to relay the human cost of the war has been fiercely criticized. But Google's willingness to censor innocuous video footage for domestic audiences suggests that rather than being a challenge to the media hierarchy that so many utopians wish it to be, Google falls into line as readily as any three-man cable affiliate.
More than likely, it was some kind of technical glitch and the author is just having a knee-jerk over reaction.... This guy is bordering on tinfoil hat conspiracy stuff anyhow, as evidenced by this paranoid sounding paragraph.
Hardly sounds like unbiased journalism.Last spring, Google chose to hire one of the most prominent public relations faces of the Iraq invasion, plucking Dan Senor (pictured left) from the desert dust where he was massaging the press on behalf of his then boss, Paul Bremer. Some might consider Dan's CV - a career in the Carlyle Group, flacking for a hardcore Israeli lobby group, and jogging credentials with the Bush-Cheney campaign a little salty. But not Google, who around the same time, also hoisted former ICANN flack and Berkman "fellow" Andrew McLaughlin into a job.![]()
Bookmarks