Also withholding judgement until there's the end result to judge. People are extremely quick to cry out against perceived oppression around here.
Also withholding judgement until there's the end result to judge. People are extremely quick to cry out against perceived oppression around here.
"Die Wahrheit ruht in Gott / Uns bleibt das Forschen." Johann von Müller
I voted yes because if this is the system given then I would rather like turns then years. I am more interested in the late medieval period, but if we would have 2 turns per year as with R:TW than I would need to play 600-700 turns before getting my culverins and men-at-arms in full plate (if advancement is based on time and not just clicking through the techtree).Something tells me that most of the 17 people who voted 'yes' on the poll misread the question, or clicked the wrong option or something.
So 225 turns suits me fine. Too much history has been cramped into those and CA should have used eras, but alas that is the game they are designing and turns is IMO the best solution for that design.
Bookmarks