VH/M still the way to go?

**soibean** · 03-05-2006, 17:12

doesn't difficulty levels for battles influence AI behavior during conflicts?
I had thought that it did

**Teleklos Archelaou** · 03-05-2006, 17:17

I just had a stalemate with a faction, playing M/M. I couldn't expand anymore and my enemies were crowding around. (embarassed)

If I take a faction I'm handy with, I'll play H/M usually. But that's just me.

**soibean** · 03-05-2006, 17:23

I usually did h/h
I was told that rebel involvement increases as the difficulty rose and I couldnt handle rebels forming in a province with 200 + loyalty so I stopped at h/h.
I never had a stalemate until I played on h/h... I think EB will change this

**tk-421** · 03-05-2006, 18:40

I play on h/h or h/m. Too many rebels on vh.

**booker** · 03-05-2006, 20:02

Interesting... i though EB memebers played on the same level, but since Teleklos Archelaou and Lordbula play on different levels this mean no Default level for EB :(

I´m going to leave the Campaign on VH, and the battles i´m going to try Medium, since the few battles i fought on M with a 1:1 ratio were a Heroic victory.

But i have 1 more question, how can you Mod/balance a game if the mod play on different level?...

if I play on H, on the campaign map, the player who play on M will have a different opinion of how hard the game is... Just a thought.. not a complain.

**Teleklos Archelaou** · 03-05-2006, 20:13

I play on M coz I'm a wus. EB officially suggests VH/M I believe.

If anyone thinks they can make me play on VH/M, they can go ahead and try.

**O'ETAIPOS** · 03-05-2006, 20:31

It depends on faction I suppose. Playing Makedonia on VH/M is not a big problem.
Sarmatians on the other hand ... well, rebels nearly crushed me(nearly, because I quit having 30 000 debt and few units left against full stacks of rebels)