Questions for Muslims at the org

[Byzantine Mercenary]

The 'Angel of Light' you may have heard of is probably Lucifer, the Light Bearer.

i heard that the angel that was supposed to have met muhammed was described as an angel of light.
what i don't understand is why god would have gone to all the effort of sending prophets if he knew their messages would be almost compleately erased and replaced?

[Banquo's Ghost]

what i don't understand is why god would have gone to all the effort of sending prophets if he knew their messages would be almost compleately erased and replaced?

Well, as Christians are fond of saying, who knows what is in God's mind?

You might say that Mohammed (pbuh) was chosen as the last prophet precisely because he ensured the Qu'ran was kept exactly as given - even ensuring the language stayed the same.

All the holy books beforehand were in many different languages and different interpretations. For those who accept the Qu'ran as the word of God, it is exactly that - unchanged.

Seems a logical step for this God fella to take.

[Byzantine Mercenary]

Well, as Christians are fond of saying, who knows what is in God's mind?

You might say that Mohammed (pbuh) was chosen as the last prophet precisely because he ensured the Qu'ran was kept exactly as given - even ensuring the language stayed the same.

All the holy books beforehand were in many different languages and different interpretations. For those who accept the Qu'ran as the word of God, it is exactly that - unchanged.

Seems a logical step for this God fella to take.

well being omnipotent he gets everything right the first time, the idea that he couldn't stop his words getting changed is weird and the Quran itself is open to interpretation in fact it contains the same sort of inconsistancys and unusually harsh sentiments (for a loving god to make) as the old testament.
The Torah is also preserved in its native tongue isn't it?

[LeftEyeNine]

i heard that the angel that was supposed to have met muhammed was described as an angel of light.
what i don't understand is why god would have gone to all the effort of sending prophets if he knew their messages would be almost compleately erased and replaced?

So how would you be accused of your sins after death without getting warned about them ?

[LeftEyeNine]

well being omnipotent he gets everything right the first time, the idea that he couldn't stop his words getting changed is weird...

The point is humankind is free to draw his destiny. I mean, you are shown what you are capable of, how you behave and react. The point is that it's not something that God is "not able to", it is something that God tests the humans about their intentions when there is no force over it.

..and the Quran itself is open to interpretation in fact it contains the same sort of inconsistancys and unusually harsh sentiments (for a loving god to make) as the old testament.

Probably considering the facts about how previous religions were partly corrupted and were re-written by humans to serve their earthly desires, the way of dictiation may feel harsh. But take human nature into account, if you draw a responsibility line, man generally performs and obeys it at lower degrees. So loosened and soft messages would totally fail, me thinks. What's more this is religion -a dogma. In Islam, the first thing you accept is the unity of Allah. You accept the power of a superior being at first step. Watching the other concepts of Islam taking this rule of thumb into account, will make it more easier to comprehend the rest about it.

Thanks for your manner approaching neutrally inquisitive towards Islam.

[Byzantine Mercenary]

The point is humankind is free to draw his destiny. I mean, you are shown what you are capable of, how you behave and react. The point is that it's not something that God is "not able to", it is something that God tests the humans about their intentions when there is no force over it.

i agree, it just would seem unfair for god to allow false teachings to prosper without any evidence for the real teaching

Probably considering the facts about how previous religions were partly corrupted and were re-written by humans to serve their earthly desires, the way of dictiation may feel harsh. But take human nature into account, if you draw a responsibility line, man generally performs and obeys it at lower degrees. So loosened and soft messages would totally fail, me thinks. What's more this is religion -a dogma. In Islam, the first thing you accept is the unity of Allah. You accept the power of a superior being at first step. Watching the other concepts of Islam taking this rule of thumb into account, will make it more easier to comprehend the rest about it.

again i agree but what about the teaching to kill those that convert from Islam?

Thanks for your manner approaching neutrally inquisitive towards Islam. :bow

Im glad that this is how you interpret my questions this is exactly what i am aiming for

[BigTex]

Originally posted by LeftEyeNine
Probably considering the facts about how previous religions were partly corrupted and were re-written by humans to serve their earthly desires, the way of dictiation may feel harsh.

The Quran was kept as oral tradition till the 11th century, around 500 years. Anything that has been kept as oral tradition that long will be changed slowly. Around the 11th century individual cities started to write down their Qurans, creating many different qurans. They were also being written during the first crusade, you can probably guess what hearing news of a city canabalized by barbaric christians would have effected the writtings held in it. Late 15th century (if I remember correctly.) is when the turkish king had all qurans but the one he wanted destroyed. My point in all this is that the quran much like the bible and many other books in the world has been changed over the milenia. The belief that any holy book is unchanged since its conception is a bit flawed. Another odd fact, Mohamed was originally an orthodox priest.

[Byzantine Mercenary]

Another odd fact, Mohamed was originally an orthodox priest.

wow! realy?

[Dâriûsh]

The Quran was kept as oral tradition till the 11th century, around 500 years. Anything that has been kept as oral tradition that long will be changed slowly.

Eh?

The first was written in the lifetime of the Prophet (pbuh).

[Banquo's Ghost]

The Quran was kept as oral tradition till the 11th century, around 500 years. Anything that has been kept as oral tradition that long will be changed slowly. Around the 11th century individual cities started to write down their Qurans, creating many different qurans.

Not really. http://www.answers.com/topic/qur-an

Actual fragments exist from the 7th century, and a full copy from the 9th. Most tradition maintains scribes wrote the words of Mohammed (pbuh) down there and then through dictation, though many modern scholars also believe that the verses were memorized (http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/ISLAM/QURAN.HTM) until Caliph Uthman collated the first official text version around 656 AD.

I thought I read recently of a copy that has been discovered that is 7th century, but I can't find the link. Anyway, it is widely accepted that the Qu'ran has remained unchanged since dictation.

[LeftEyeNine]

BigTex, you should simply revise your source(s) about Quran.

[Byzantine Mercenary]

So how would you be accused of your sins after death without getting warned about them ?

oh, what i meant was why give a prophecy to your prophets that you know will be replaced so that even those trying to follow the prophets will be unable to