Bold and Comic Sans MS added by me. There's shrapnel from the bomb inside the building, obviously then there are not just marks on the ceiling but holes in the roof. It's more then likely the reporter would assume you would know that there would be holes in the roof not just in the ceiling. Or the reporters definition of ceiling is different then yours. A 5.56mm round isnt suddenly going to stop at the ceiling of a house anyways, obviously there's going to be holes in it. The article also doesn't mention any otopsy findings, either they conflict with his story, he doesnt have them, or they werent done. Personally I would assume that if shrapnel from the bomb got in the houses that some of the civillian deaths were from the bomb and not from the insuing fire fight.Originally Posted by The Article
Time said the available evidence did not prove the marines deliberately killed civilians. The magazine, however, said its investigation showed that walls and ceilings in both houses were pockmarked with shrapnel and bullet holes as well as sprays of blood. The video did not show any bullet holes on the outside of the houses — holes that might support the military report of a gunbattle.
Bookmarks