Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

  1. #1

    Default Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    what do people think on 'could of hannibal taken rome ' i dont think he could he had no support and the romans were still strong but people argue that he only did this because his father always told him that he should be coucious of the romans so i want other peoples opinions on this
    "Do you have blacks, too?" —to Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 2001
    "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
    —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
    "I want you to know. Karyn is with us. A West Texas girl, just like me."
    —Nashville, Tenn., May 27, 2004

    how stupid george bush is !

  2. #2

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    Well the only real window for him to take Rome was after Cannae and even then it would had all come down to if the Romans wanted to fight or surrender. Knowing Roman nature I'd doubt that they would do that.

    The problem that Hannibal had in taking Rome was the fact that his army had to keep itself mobile to sustain itself by foraging and he lacked secure supply lines and bases to besiege Rome.

    Also I doubt that Hannibal could had taken Rome with an assault without immense preparations, which he again could not afford.
    Friendship, Fun & Honour!

    "The Prussian army always attacks."
    -Frederick the Great

  3. #3

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    thats what im saying he had no money or any type of support but i think he had the skill but not the money but i want too see if anyone has another opinion on it
    "Do you have blacks, too?" —to Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 2001
    "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
    —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
    "I want you to know. Karyn is with us. A West Texas girl, just like me."
    —Nashville, Tenn., May 27, 2004

    how stupid george bush is !

  4. #4
    Magister Vitae Senior Member Kraxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Posts
    7,129

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    I will say no...

    He could not.
    Rome was not defenceless, it was pretty well armed and protected. Sure it's legions were not ready for field battles, but defending from battlements would be significantly easier. And it wasn't as if the older veterans in Rome wouldn't have picked up their arms and hurried to the walls.

    He would likely have faced similar number to his own by the time he got there. Not very good when they had the advantage of defences. And I think they had another field army trudging about in Cisalpine Gaul, not to talk about the troops in Hispania. Both of which would likely have come running as soon as Rome was put under siege.

    Lastly, he didn't have the numbers to maintain a proper siege of a city of this size, especially not with similar cities around the region, which could possibly make his own foraging a problem.

    I would say that he could maintain a few weeks of siege, then would have to break off when the Roman armies neared and his possibilities for foraging had diminished, partly due to local militias defending the forage.
    You may not care about war, but war cares about you!


  5. #5
    German Enthusiast Member Alexanderofmacedon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Where Columbus condemned the natives
    Posts
    3,124

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraxis
    I will say no...

    He could not.
    Rome was not defenceless, it was pretty well armed and protected. Sure it's legions were not ready for field battles, but defending from battlements would be significantly easier. And it wasn't as if the older veterans in Rome wouldn't have picked up their arms and hurried to the walls.

    He would likely have faced similar number to his own by the time he got there. Not very good when they had the advantage of defences. And I think they had another field army trudging about in Cisalpine Gaul, not to talk about the troops in Hispania. Both of which would likely have come running as soon as Rome was put under siege.

    Lastly, he didn't have the numbers to maintain a proper siege of a city of this size, especially not with similar cities around the region, which could possibly make his own foraging a problem.

    I would say that he could maintain a few weeks of siege, then would have to break off when the Roman armies neared and his possibilities for foraging had diminished, partly due to local militias defending the forage.
    Agreed


  6. #6
    Retired Member matteus the inbred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Up a mountain... Ok, London.
    Posts
    739

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    yes indeed, well summarised Kraxis. I think it's a testament to Hannibal's military skill that he didn't even try to properly besiege Rome, he knew it couldn't be done.
    He needed a fleet to blockade Ostia too.
    Support Your Local Pirate

    Ahaaaaaar

  7. #7
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    There was no way of getting through Rome's walls, and Rome had better ability to field new armies after defeats.

    Maybe, in a very far-fetched scenario he could have succeeded. If Hasdrubal and Hannibal had had telephone contact, and Hannibal would have won at Cannae, then moved north to meet Hasdrubal, and join forces there instead of having Hasdrubal getting killed. Then they could march down to Rome slowly, while helping to install gallic rulers, garrisons and a clever constitution in every city along the way to keep them under gallic rule. They would then occupy a few fortified cities near Rome, and sending away or exterminating all locals in these cities. Then, once at Rome, they could have used something like the circumvallatio, or maybe just the castrum that Pyrrhus used not too long afterwards, to siege Rome safely, assuming he could either assault or naval blockade Ostia... With that method they could maybe have won, despite a smaller supply of men, ships and money. Probably not 100% impossible scenario, but unlikely (especially the telephone ).

    To give Hannibal the credit he deserves I don't doubt for a second that Hannibal would have been able to easily defeat Carthage if he had been on the roman side!
    Last edited by Rodion Romanovich; 04-05-2006 at 11:44.
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

  8. #8

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    any more opinions .I agree with the people above does anyone think he could have ?
    "Do you have blacks, too?" —to Brazilian President Fernando Cardoso, Washington, D.C., Nov. 8, 2001
    "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
    —Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004
    "I want you to know. Karyn is with us. A West Texas girl, just like me."
    —Nashville, Tenn., May 27, 2004

    how stupid george bush is !

  9. #9
    Come to daddy Member Geoffrey S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Shell Beach
    Posts
    4,028

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    No. Even after Cannae (with exhausted Carthaginian troops) the Romans had enough men and time to hold Rome and make an assault a near impossible prospect. Hannibal had far too few men to even actually surround the city, so he couldn't starve the place, and before long reinforcements would have arrived.

    Only real chance he had was to hold the south and hope for reinforcements; that hope all but ended when Hasdrubal failed to reach him.
    "The facts of history cannot be purely objective, since they become facts of history only in virtue of the significance attached to them by the historian." E.H. Carr

  10. #10
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,454

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    I've always thought that Hannibal's stroke was one of the boldest efforts in history.

    Elephants over the alps, attacking a powerful foe on their home ground, and beating the ... snot ... out of them at virtually every turn.

    It should have worked. Against any number of political entities of the day it would have. How many other states Hannibal might have faced could have withstood the psychological blows he inflicted and fought on? How many other states would have folded, asked for terms, and paid handsomely to end the threat?

    The resilience of the Roman Republic was amazing. For all its flaws, they had a flexibility and a core-strength that made them almost impossible to conquer -- no matter how often you defeated them.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  11. #11
    Viceroy of the Indian Empire Member Duke Malcolm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Dùn Dèagh, the People's Republic of Scotland, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
    Posts
    2,783

    Default Re: Peoples opinions on 'could hannibal of taken rome '

    I thought it was Hannibal of Carthage...? Oh, "Could Hannibal have taken Rome?"

    Bad grammar aside, no. Hannibal's army was too exhausted and depleted, especially after Cannae...
    It was not theirs to reason why,
    It was not theirs to make reply,
    It was theirs but to do or die.
    -The Charge of the Light Brigade - Alfred, Lord Tennyson

    "Wherever this stone shall lie, the King of the Scots shall rule"
    -Prophecy of the Stone of Destiny

    "For God, For King and country, For loved ones home and Empire, For the sacred cause of justice, and The freedom of the world, They buried him among the kings because he, Had done good toward God and toward his house."
    -Inscription on the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO