Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Evolution of blitzkrieg

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: Evolution of blitzkrieg

    The Doctrine for advanced defence novadays atleat here is mobile defence.Since troops march Motorized and Mechanized fast today and the total Firepower of supporting weapon systems is so devastating the smart defender doesnt stay in place and instead decides when to fight and where.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Evolution of blitzkrieg

    Quote Originally Posted by Kagemusha
    The Doctrine for advanced defence novadays atleat here is mobile defence.Since troops march Motorized and Mechanized fast today and the total Firepower of supporting weapon systems is so devastating the smart defender doesnt stay in place and instead decides when to fight and where.
    This additionally stresses the need for air superiority today. Without air superiority to protect troop movements those mechanized formations will not be able to actually keep themselves mobile.
    Friendship, Fun & Honour!

    "The Prussian army always attacks."
    -Frederick the Great

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member Brenus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Wokingham
    Posts
    3,523

    Default Re: Evolution of blitzkrieg

    So the next move will be to neutralize the air cover. It was done by the Egyptians in 1973, when the SAM protected the tanks from the Israelis Air Force. If the Egyptians would have stick to this tactic, perhaps the outcome of the war would have change. Not sure, because the Sharon’s offensive was a master movement…
    Don’t over estimate air power… At the end, it is up to the army to finish the fight.
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. Voltaire.

    "I've been in few famous last stands, lad, and they're butcher shops. That's what Blouse's leading you into, mark my words. What'll you lot do then? We've had a few scuffles, but that's not war. Think you'll be man enough to stand, when the metal meets the meat?"
    "You did, sarge", said Polly." You said you were in few last stands."
    "Yeah, lad. But I was holding the metal"
    Sergeant Major Jackrum 10th Light Foot Infantery Regiment "Inns-and-Out"

  4. #4
    Shadow Senior Member Kagemusha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Helsinki,Finland
    Posts
    9,596

    Default Re: Evolution of blitzkrieg

    Yep.I think Brenus has a point there.Ofcourse the land forces need SAM´s to provide cover when on movement. Actually when we look at the reacent conflicts the defender has always had very outdated weapon systems for protecting its troops from Air attacks.Ofcourse if the attacker has absolute Air supremacy the defender is mostly immobilized or will commit suicide moving its troops like in reacent Gulf Wars. But a smart defender who wants to win battles tryes always to have a local superiority over the enemy if he wants to stop the attacker becouse in most cases the attacker has superiority in overall numbers so the attacking side has potential to succeed in their Operation. So the modern defender needs to hide his forces properly when staying in put.provide enough weapon systems to protect his forces while in movement and try to provide locall superiority in both Air and Land when attacking.
    Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO