Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Darren_Shan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    at my computer
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    same with me
    Mizukage of the Shinobi Clan

  2. #2
    Magister Vitae Senior Member Kraxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Posts
    7,129

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    It is funny that such an axe has never been used in Denmark for war.

    There is a reason there is a weapon called the 'danish' axe... why on Earth not use it? Or the 'bearded' axe??? They had it quite well done for the pictures of the units in VI (or even the Viking in MTW).

    Well, I just don't like him very much. Nothing with him tells me he is a Huscarl, just and armoured man with an axe and a small shield.

    This is not nitpicking, this is downright out of the question. This man is NOT a huscarl.
    You may not care about war, but war cares about you!


  3. #3

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    Quote Originally Posted by Kraxis
    This man is NOT a huscarl.
    Then show us one.

    I like this one. My fave so far. I think the "pretty factor" is astounding but I am most considered about gameplay. Improving seige balance is probably my biggest concern. In RTW it was nearly impossible to lose a seige when defending. On the attack it was also far too easy because the AI units acted with no regard to their own safety. Not even basic strategy. Major immersion and fun killer.

    New pic at the com:
    Last edited by Divinus Arma; 04-08-2006 at 08:30.
    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." -Einstein

    Quote Originally Posted by Pannonian View Post
    The Backroom is the Crackroom.

  4. #4
    Time Lord Member The_Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The TARDIS
    Posts
    2,040

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls


  5. #5
    Resident Pessimist Member Dooz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AEnima city, USA
    Posts
    1,897

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    Maybe some of the other models will have that look. In any case, I still love the unit.

    Divinus, there's a whole topic about that pic here somewhere. Plenty of similar discussions about that unit with it's bulky lance and whatnot. Ah, humanity. How predictable.

  6. #6

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    A Danish axe and/ or a great big kite shield would go down a treat. Hopefully they will be able to form a shield wall. Also a mercenary unit would be good.
    Last edited by Furious Mental; 04-08-2006 at 15:43.

  7. #7
    Member Member Darren_Shan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    at my computer
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    wow those cav look great!
    Mizukage of the Shinobi Clan

  8. #8
    Magister Vitae Senior Member Kraxis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Frederiksberg, Denmark
    Posts
    7,129

    Default Re: New unit at the .com: Huscarls

    Quote Originally Posted by Furious Mental
    A Danish axe and/ or a great big kite shield would go down a treat. Hopefully they will be able to form a shield wall. Also a mercenary unit would be good.
    A shieldwall with those shields? You have got to be kidding me.

    I'm glad that you guys like this unit, but I don't. I would prefer if he was called Armoured Axeman since he seems to be in line with the Swordsman.

    A Huscarl was the supreme warrior of the king (of course the king's bodyguards might be better). There is no chance he would be without a proper helmet or a big shield (round or kite). This man is an odd mix of a lower level warrior and a nobleman. The hauberk is noble but the rest is lower level.

    The axe is as I said very odd, such an axe was just not used. Why not use the plethora of axes that were used instead of making up an axe that just looks foolish? Bah!

    The shield... Ahhh... The simple fact is that the shield was considered the most important piece of equipment if you had it all (of course it wouldn't help you much if you had no weapon). Without the big shield you couldn't form the shield wall, which was the main formation. Individual fighting (in battle) was, as always rather unlikely, when it happened it was mainly done with twohanded axes.
    This man can't enter a shield wall because his shield is too small to offer enough protection when it is immobile, and his axe is simply too small to offer him any advantage in a fight.

    Give him a bow and sling the shield onto his back and I might be willing to accept him as some sort of Royal Archer.
    You may not care about war, but war cares about you!


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO