there should always have to be someomone sitting on the throne at home or something similar. so if you decide to personally as the king go campaigning you have to choose a prince or perhaps a general to act in his stead.

Reply

This would inhibit expansion largely if you needed a Prince to cover the throne if your King went on an expedition. And has been in no other TW so I don't think they will put this in.

Also with an original starting setup of 225 turns, not having a son for a while would stop your conquest of the map.

Reply

The original idea is very good. I don't see why not. CA plans on making armor improvements viewable on the battle map. There should be no reason that title cannot be viewed in the same category.

Reply

But how much strong graphic cards we will need if that would implement? Not to mention RAM...

Reply

I'd love for there to be a title system such as this, it would add much more depth to the game, especially if you where the one who decides which of your generals receives these titles etc.

Reply

and the ability to force select a general of a stack, so you could choose a lower command but higher loyalty general but this may cause loyalty drop in generals who were originally above him.

Reply

Interesting idea.

Lets assume 100 provinces, this would give us 100 unique coat of arms.
any army raised in that province could have the nations flag as well as his lords flag.

That would be a very nice touch.

I expect it would be very complicated to program

Reply