Quote Originally Posted by Soulforged
Let me see if I get this right. Some are of the interpretation that the second amendment, specially the part about the militia, means that in any case the people will have arms to defend and overthrow the government, arms are for act. Now you're saying me that the first amendment fobids public speeches where you make apologies about the overthrowing of the government. So you can act but you cannot tell it to anybody, unless you tell it with calm? How cool is that!!
You have it wrong - using the term apology would indicate something about a complete misunderstanding of not only the 1st Ammendment but also the 2nd.

one can not advocate the violent overthrow of the government and not suffer some sort of consequences. However the lady was not advocating the violent overthrown of the government of the United States, nor does it seem she was advocating the death of the Chinese President. So the reasoning behind her arrest on the surface (according to the article) is political.

Talking about other countries and their violent oppression of their people is allowed, however as demonstrated by the news article - it seems it is not allowed in certain places.

The 2nd Ammendment allows for the procession of weapons by the citizens to secure the freedom of the state.