Results 1 to 30 of 36

Thread: Another new official screenshot! (2 May)

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #26
    Thread killer Member Rodion Romanovich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    The dark side
    Posts
    5,383

    Default Re: Sv: Re: Sv: Re: Another new official screenshot!

    I agree, siege weapons in field battles make it too easy for the human player, the AI can very seldom handle them properly. You can always do things such as a cavalry raid vs enemy artillery, then use own arty freely against them, or pick high ground and destroy their art from a higher position, then rain arty freely over them etc. and the AI usually stands still, or if it tries to attack gets so demoralized by the artillery that it's unfair. Artillery wasn't really a regular part of field battles until the late Medieval period (French at the end of hundred years war, the hussite war waggons, and so on), but there were a few armies (mostly steppe armies) that invented fairly mobile artillery quite early, but even then, artillery hardly ever killed more than 1 percent or so of the enemy force, acting more to demoralize than to kill. Before the medieval period the romans also had mobile field artillery in their carroballistae, but they were mobile on the strategic level (mule carts) but hardly any mobile at all once the battle started, and they too were quite ineffective. No, I think artillery should be very restricted, and have very little ammunition for field battles if they are included in those too.
    Last edited by Rodion Romanovich; 05-03-2006 at 16:48.
    Under construction...

    "In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO