We have to remember that in Japanese culture the worst thing that could happen to invidual was loosing face. Even death was better then loosing your face. That is why for example Seppuku was thought as better option then surrender. But we have to remember that it was not black and white.For example during Sengoku Jidai period when castle fell the Lord usually committed Seppuku or died fighting.In Samurai ethics it was right thing to do to accept ones responsibility in face of failure.But the normal soldiers rarely would have committed mass suicide but surrendered.And in couple years they could be fighting in for their new masters.In all armies through out the ages there has been suicide missions and soldiers that accepted those while knowing they wouldnt return.Kamikaze were basicly planes turned into missiles by loading those full of explosives.The thing was that they needed to be operated by men.And Japan had lots of soldiers willing to die for Emperor.Its simple calculation.If you loose one man and airplane and possibly destroy enemy ship,is that acceptable prize?How does that differ for example modern day warfare and infantry man shooting his rocket propelled granade against modern MainBattleTank that will even when destroyed shoot all its weapons in the direction where it spotted that RPG.And kill the Anti tank soldier? Its also simple calculation loosing one man and destroying a MBT,is that too big prize to pay?
Bookmarks