Well, I would be interested in riots protesting terrorist attacks.
Well, I would be interested in riots protesting terrorist attacks.
Well, I'm sure they would be interested in riots protesting the civilian deaths in their countries due to our bombs...Originally Posted by Alexander the Pretty Good
After all, most of the war protests are small (opposition to it is large) and focus on getting our troops out of there...
Last edited by Reenk Roink; 05-09-2006 at 23:33.
Civil War? I'm sorry, but al-Qaeda is much too small of an organization and controls no land. It would have to be a..."war on terror". But it also must be done ideologically which is why this response by an important Muslim scholar was such a pleasing find on google:
http://www.mereislam.info/articles/D...A-Al-Akiti.pdf
*it's long, and I skimmed through it, but it is a good read*
Also, there was this interesting interview with Sadr in Newsweek, that firebrand Iraqi cleric, who earlier was on our hitlist because he was able to hold back our military quite effectively, and only backed down when his superior Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani wagged his finger. He was talking about how he classified the Sunni's into two groups:
1) The majority who are his brothers in Islam
2) The takfiri's who follow Zarqawi and kill Iraqis and need to be fought
See, I think that the Muslim world in general is doing it's best to shed the unfair 'terrorist' label...
If this isn't enough evidence, than I don't know what is...
Last edited by Reenk Roink; 05-10-2006 at 00:06. Reason: grammar problem: 'to' should have been 'too'
You are going to fit in well at U of M.Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Bookmarks