Time for another of my periodic "Gimme books!" threads.![]()
So, I've got the most recent edition of the classic 'Anglo-Saxon England' by Stenton. Also a few biographies covering the end of the period (Aethelred II, Cnut, Edward the Confessor, two on Queen Emma), and a few books which cover the drag end of the period (e.g. 'The Feudal Kingdom of England 1042 - 1216' by Barlow), and a smattering on the gentle subject of war ('Anglo-Saxon weapons and warfare' by Underwood, the Osprey books). Except Stenton is very old now, and has gaps. The others cover only a small part of the whole.
I want titles which cover it all: events, battles, personages, but also society, law - what's often considered the boring peaceful bits. Social history, aka the soft option, aka the bit amphibian writers find shamefully fascinating and need to drown in before they put pen to paper. Don’t let my wording fool you - I’m not adverse to books which only cover a single topic, so long as they do it well. I like such books. I’ve got literally over a hundred of them for medieval England alone. Got three books on medieval horses alone …
One thing to be borne in mind is that the frog hasn't dabbled in this era for a long, long time, and much of what she learned was waaay back when she was a mere tadpole rummaging around through children's history books. Except for the bits she has picked up while reading about England just before and after 1066. However, the frog would far rather have a complicated book which made her brain hurt than one of those crappy lightweight histories she keeps stumbling across each time she hunts for potential titles. I want good history, the sort you can base things on without being laughed off the stage or making disastrous errors which ruin the authenticity of the background for your 900 page story.
If the 'New Oxford History of England' series put out the Saxon volume to sit before the three medieval ones I expect my problem would mostly be solved, insofar as any one book can solve any matter of history. Alas, they don't seem willing thus far; I haven't heard a thing about it, not even that it is being considered. :grumble:
Bookmarks