I just toss in my general wiew.I think that matters of faith should be evalueted as matter of faith.If a person chooses to believe on something he or she has the right to do so. Who are we others to judge what invidual wants to believe in. When we talk about faith we talk about sets of beliefs that necessarily have details that can be denied by science. But if you read religious texts from a wiew of a believer,they offer you values.I dont think that any profet of any religion was there to tell history to rest of us,but what they tryed to do was to offer us a healthy set of values in their belief.Ofcourse in most cases the original ideas of the holy men in different religions were twisted to something completely different,that the person originally ment. But i think that the basic idea should be when we are talking about religions is that while there are different dogmas on different religions, in the end a religion is mostly just one persons personal beliefs.And beliefs can be irrational to others many times like we so often see in for example political conversations,where the opposing party makes absolutely no sense what so ever.![]()
Bookmarks