Results 1 to 30 of 576

Thread: The Will of the Senate - out of character thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #14
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: RTR 6.0 Gold PBEM

    OK, I've posted a call for players at the RTR Platinum forum:

    http://forums.rometotalrealism.org/i...howtopic=20179

    Hopefully we'll get some interest. I'll make similar calls in the Org in due course.


    [EDIT]: Some very interesting ideas, there, Mount

    I think rules 6+ have been overtaken by events, so I've edited the relevant post to make that clear.

    Autoresolving is a biggie. I've never done it but I'm interested in what other people think. The idea of involving non-incumbents in fighting particular battles sounds fun, but may slow things down. I'm thinking of dividing the Senate into two houses - lower (like your frontbench), where members want to play out turns and upper (like your backbench) where there is no such implied commitment[1]. We probably should prioritise avatars for members of the lower House and so expecting them to fight out ad hoc battles would not be unreasonable. If they forfeit - e.g. don't respond to the call to battle within two days and so the battle is autoresolved - the Senate may look unfavorably on a future candidature for the First Consul.

    On the age thing, I have similar restrictions in my own games. I like the "true Roman" guidelines on the RTR tips and strategies sub-forum - teenage youngsters first stay at an academy, then sometime in their 20s become military tribunes (2nd general in a stack) etc. But I am not inflexible, as I can't help thinking of outstanding generals and Kings - not Roman, I admit - who were ridiculously young. So if we have an ambitious young thing with lots of command stars and we were in a desperate situation, I might let him have a command. I'd be tempted to make it a guideline, rather than a hard and fast rule (maybe the Senate might have to authorise violations of the rule? perhaps ex post).

    Not sure about MSN - I don't use it and would rather try to use this forum - and PMs - to try to build up a collegiate spirit here.

    On reflection, I like your proposals but let's get other views.

    [1]Participants would be able to switch between upper and lower Houses of the Senate at any time.
    Last edited by econ21; 05-20-2006 at 13:05.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO