Another 900 years of culture bites the dust.

**Fragony** · 05-14-2006, 10:35

Well, after the removal of a christian symbole from a war-monument to prevent muslims from igniting the multicultists decided that the Netherlands is still a pretty nice country to live, how dare we.

The symbol of the southern provinve 'Noord Brabant' is the wild boar, and it has been quite some time. Now, happy birthday Noord Brabant, you are 900 ears old congrats! That calls for a party, and a nice party needs a nice symbol, so why not the one that has been the provincial symbol for 900 years? Problem is, a wild boar is basicly a pig, guess who might take offence? Correct, you guys are getting better at this. Multicultists of Holland, rise and proudly proclaim, Ich Bin Laden. Long live Lalaland.

**Ser Clegane** · 05-14-2006, 10:41

Originally Posted by Fragony

Problem is, a wild boar is basicly a pig, guess who might take offence? Correct, you guys are getting better at this. Multicultists of Holland, rise and proudly proclaim, Ich Bin Laden. Long live Lalaland.

This sounds quite absurd - can you provide some more background what happened there?

This rather seems to be a problem of "non-culti" than of "multi-culti"...

**Fragony** · 05-14-2006, 10:54

Originally Posted by Ser Clegane

This sounds quite absurd - can you provide some more background what happened there?

This rather seems to be a problem of "non-culti" than of "multi-culti"...

What I said is what happened, the logo got the no because a pig was potentially offensive to muslims.

http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/dail...99162067627591

it's a pay site, but bugmenot will probably work. Here is the most important part,

„Weet je wat ze tegen medewerkers vertelde?” zegt hij luidkeels. „Ze wil Brabant niet associëren met een varken, want dat vindt ze niet netjes tegenover de moslimbevolking in Brabant. Nou, dat is toch gewoon een lachwekkende argumentatie? Islamieten eten geen varkensvlees, maar je mag wel naar een zwijn kijken!”

And ya, it is non culture, but only if it's our own. Every time I think the multicultists couldn't become more insane they surprise me. Basicly they are calling every muslim a potential terrorist, I wonder if they thought of that.

**Ser Clegane** · 05-14-2006, 10:55

Originally Posted by Fragony

What I said is what happened, the logo got the no because a pig was potentially offensive to muslims.

http://telegraaf-i.telegraaf.nl/dail...99162067627591

it's a pay site, but bugmenot will probably work. Here is the most important part,

„Weet je wat ze tegen medewerkers vertelde?” zegt hij luidkeels. „Ze wil Brabant niet associëren met een varken, want dat vindt ze niet netjes tegenover de moslimbevolking in Brabant. Nou, dat is toch gewoon een lachwekkende argumentatie? Islamieten eten geen varkensvlees, maar je mag wel naar een zwijn kijken!”

And ya, it is non culture, but only if it's our own. Every time I think the multicultists couldn't become more insane they surprise me. Basicly they are calling every muslim a potential terrorist, I wonder if they thought of that.

So this is (once again) something that is not driven by muslims but by people who claim to be acting out of concern for muslim feelings (if my limited understanding of the Dutch language does not betray me)?

**Fragony** · 05-14-2006, 11:04

Originally Posted by Ser Clegane

So this is (once again) something that is not driven by muslims but by people who claim to be acting out of concern for muslim feelings (if my limited understanding of the Dutch language does not betray me)?

You are correct, as far as I know no muslim asked for this (but it is not true for the christian cross story). Have they gone completily bonkers or is it just me? How on earth will this multiculti-nonsense ever work with all these 'sorry I am me' multicultist fools?

hmmm, this looks old

(Deleted hotlink pic - Beirut)

**LeftEyeNine** · 05-14-2006, 12:16

I think Muslims with common sense over there should organize for its re-depictation..What's up with that pig ? This action is totally provocative, let alone it being done in order to keep away from any conflicts.

If there is some website or something against it, please let us know so that we can write down some lines in the guestbook.

**Louis VI the Fat** · 05-14-2006, 12:29

The wild boar is an even older symbol of Celtic origin. At Yule one was sacrificed and served with an apple in his mouth. Those of you familiar with 'Asterix' will get the picture.

The boar was a major symbol for the Celts living in the northern forests, in what is now Northern France, Belgium and the Netherlands. The symbol has survived 1500 years of Christianity. That it should now be scrapped in festivities after 30 years of Islam is intolerable.

I've got no links in English either, but I can confirm what Fragony said though. The Belgian newspapers reported it too (half of Brabant is a Belgian province).

Brussels, the capitol of Europe, will not use it's own symbol -one more ancient than the Roman Empire - to celebrate it's history, in a bid to not offend muslims. It's self-cencorship gone astray.

**Louis VI the Fat** · 05-14-2006, 12:34

Originally Posted by Ser Clegane

So this is (once again) something that is not driven by muslims but by people who claim to be acting out of concern for muslim feelings?

That is my interpretation too. I highly doubt there is a Muslim pressure group demanding the removal of wild boar symbols.

It is silly, it portrays Muslims as fanatics when most probably couldn't care any less.