Since it seems that you are misusing the term moral equilevency lets review what it really means. Like I stated very early on - I do not play moral equilevency games.

It also seems that you are not even following the proper meaning of the term.

A good written document on the subject

http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/gaddis.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_equivalence

Then there is your use of moral relativism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism

Your arguement in attempting to compare my opinion to supporting dictatorship and nazism demonstrates these points very well. If your going to argue that my postion is wrong provide concrete evidence in the form of constitutions that state there exists a legal right to advocate the violent overthrow of the established authority.