Quote Originally Posted by LegioXXXUlpiaVictrix
Then I'm afraid you're abusing the word. That moral equivalency definition means that if you say x did y, but z did w, so x isn't better than y. Well, that's not the point of my examples.
That is exactly what you have done. So don't try to worm your way out of it. Comparing my opinion to nazi doctrine is just that.

So the correct term you're looking for isn't moral equivalency, it's synthesis. While analysis is the action of "taking something apart in order to study it", synthesis is putting together principles and seeing the consequences they imply in a practical situation. The analysis would be you looking at 5 unsecure cars and seeing that they were all blue, thus stating that "all blue cars are unsafe". Your synthesis, by looking at blue cars in reality, you find that there are blue cars which are safe, and that car color isn't causally related to safety properties of the car. That's the purpose of synthesis - trying as hard as you can to find counter-examples to whatever thesis you stated after an analysis, to see if the attempt at a general statement was good or not.
Again attempting to worm your way out of your use of moral equalivency and moral relativity does not make your false arguement any better.