Results 1 to 30 of 37

Thread: Was the Roman Empire meant to last?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Was the Roman Empire meant to last?

    The only thing that lasts is the marks something has left on society. For example look at Shakespeare, after 400 or so years we are still forced to read the works of that ***** at schools!

    I'm sorry if am repeating what everyone else has said, but:

    The Roman Empire like all Empires was strong when it was winning and had competition and neighbours to overcome. However, once it had crushed everyone it became complacent and arrogant. It did not recognise the dangers at hand, internal decay and barbarian greed for the riches of the Empire. It acted to late and thus failed in a time of crisis. And has faded into a fond memory and something to base computer games on.

    As one man falls another rises to hold the weight of the world.
    Last edited by naut; 05-28-2006 at 12:26.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO