PC Mode
Org Mobile Site
Forum > Discussion > Frontroom (General) >
Thread: Pulling porn out of thin air !
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
doc_bean 21:13 05-31-2006
Long live Fox !

Originally Posted by :
What mom thought was just a game is actually a very sophisticated piece of electronics that a clever kid can use to capture pornographic images out of thin air. In the school's library, Jeff was eager to show his friends his new Sony Play Station Portable, or PSP. On a dare, Jeff showed his pals how the PSP could magically display images of naked women.


Reply
Ice 21:16 05-31-2006
Smart kid.

Reply
naut 22:06 05-31-2006
Wait a minute, how old was this kid?

Reply
Alexanderofmacedon 22:41 05-31-2006
How can I contact him?

..err...I mean...

Reply
Reverend Joe 23:41 05-31-2006
That article reads like it was written by a kid.

No offense, but there is a certain level of grammatical and compositional proficiency required even in basic journalism.

Reply
Ronin 00:18 06-01-2006
if there is porn....there is a way!

Reply
ShadesPanther 01:44 06-01-2006
I like this bit
Originally Posted by :
But David Walsh of the National Institute on Media and the Family, says game makers have a responsibility too. They should let parents know that their product could give a kid easy access to pornography.
They should put a warning sticker up

Originally Posted by :
warningFree Porn!!!!!!!
and watch sales skyrocket.

Reply
mercian billman 05:07 06-01-2006
Does anybody know when this article is written, I've known this was possible since September of 2005. Not that I've taken advantage of it, but I do know people who bought PSPs so they could download porn.

Reply
GoreBag 05:18 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Zorba:
That article reads like it was written by a kid.

No offense, but there is a certain level of grammatical and compositional proficiency required even in basic journalism.
I agree. This article makes me too mad to try to decipher it.

Reply
BHCWarman88 05:33 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Zorba:
That article reads like it was written by a kid.

No offense, but there is a certain level of grammatical and compositional proficiency required even in basic journalism.

Mabye Doc_Bean wrote it


Reply
AntiochusIII 09:04 06-01-2006
My God! How low does Fox get with quality?

I mean, how does this draft gets past the editors unpolished?

Now, to the article: old news. I know people who have been doing that for quite a long time; I, of course, does not take advantage of it. First because I don't have a PSP, and second because looking at porn at school is not cool.

Reply
Avicenna 09:16 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Fox:
Last month a 14-year old boy in Bismark, North Dakota got caught bringing porn into school on his PSP. The local authorities decided to make an example of the boy and charged him with a felony.


Reply
Duke Malcolm 09:55 06-01-2006
I couldn't be bothered reading the whole article, it is rather bad.
But I think it is worrying that they can readily access any wireless network...

Reply
doc_bean 11:00 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by BHCWarman88:
Mabye Doc_Bean wrote it
What ??? Is my English that bad ?

Besides, i would't call wi-fi magic or refer to the PSP as a game...

EDIT: and I posted this article here in the frontroom to mock the bad journalism, the bad writing and the general cluelessness of the article. Not to have an in depth discussion on the morality of portable porn, then it would have gone into the backroom. Some of you people are taking this way too seriously...

Reply
edyzmedieval 12:29 06-01-2006
Smart kid. I like him.

FREE PORN AND NAKED WOMEN TO EVERYBODY WHO HAS A PSP!!!

Reply
Mikeus Caesar 12:45 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Fox:
Last month a 14-year old boy in Bismark, North Dakota got caught bringing porn into school on his PSP. The local authorities decided to make an example of the boy and charged him with a felony.
Why? It's not like looking at porn is a horrific crime. If anything, it's perfectly healthy for teenage boys to look at porn. It's when a teenage boy isn't interested in porn that there is something wrong.

Reply
English assassin 13:55 06-01-2006
I agree teenagers should not be allowed to view teh pron on the internet.

They should be made to go to a newsagents in a different part of town to where they live, pretend to be having a hard time deciding what chocolate bar to buy until all the other customers have left, and then snatch a magazine at random from the top shelf and pay for it without making eye contact with the shopkeeper, same as we had to.

Kids today, don't know they are born.

Reply
BHCWarman88 17:22 06-01-2006
Yea,Dumb Kiddie these days........ :-) :-)
I'm glad I'm not one of them..

Reply
doc_bean 17:25 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by English assassin:
I agree teenagers should not be allowed to view teh pron on the internet.

They should be made to go to a newsagents in a different part of town to where they live, pretend to be having a hard time deciding what chocolate bar to buy until all the other customers have left, and then snatch a magazine at random from the top shelf and pay for it without making eye contact with the shopkeeper, same as we had to.

Kids today, don't know they are born.
Seriously, that doesn't weigh up to your dad discovering your porn stash...

Reply
Duke Malcolm 17:29 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by doc_bean:
Seriously, that doesn't weigh up to your dad discovering your porn stash...
They had that back in English Assassin's day too... It's not new...
And with the Interweb, one does not have a pornographic stash of magazines ans such, just a dubious hard drive and a severely ill-working computer...

Reply
English assassin 17:30 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by doc_bean:
Seriously, that doesn't weigh up to your dad discovering your porn stash...
This too is arse about face. In my day any responsible father ensured his porn stash was "hidden" somewhere where his teenage son could readily find it, thus setting the lad off on the right path.

Either that or my dad imagined magazines became invisible when they are placed face down next to the bed.

Reply
The Stranger 17:33 06-01-2006
no his dad discovered his not the other way around

Reply
doc_bean 17:37 06-01-2006
Originally Posted by Duke Malcolm:
They had that back in English Assassin's day too... It's not new...
And with the Interweb, one does not have a pornographic stash of magazines ans such, just a dubious hard drive and a severely ill-working computer...
Okay, but back in the day, he wouldn't have made a friggin' copy of it.....

Reply
Moros 18:25 06-01-2006
who doesn't have porn on his PSP? Why don't I have a psp? Ohw yeah I have a 200GB HD! Don't you just love modern technology?

Reply
Duke Malcolm 18:31 06-01-2006
I have a 20GB HD and no PSP... No...

Reply
Vladimir 22:12 06-01-2006
Definitely fits into the *yawn* category. As well as those people that can't differentiate a cable news channel from a local broadcast show.

Reply
Oaty 01:48 06-02-2006
I had it rough as a kid, when I got ahold of a magazine my dad would steal it from me.

Reply
doc_bean 11:51 06-02-2006
Originally Posted by Vladimir:
Definitely fits into the *yawn* category. As well as those people that can't differentiate a cable news channel from a local broadcast show.
Fox doesn't protect its name ?

Reply
edyzmedieval 19:03 06-02-2006
Hey, a guy will see at least a porn pic before 16 years even if he does want or not.

For example, I see tons of porn magazines which are not covered, so I get to see everything.

Reply
Moros 19:13 06-02-2006
ofcourse you didn't want to see them. ofcourse they were not covered. ofcourse.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last
Up
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO