Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7
    Retired Member matteus the inbred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Up a mountain... Ok, London.
    Posts
    739

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    I try to use Roman "manipular" (or checkerboard) tactics at least with realism mods like RTR and EB. It works very well against phalanx type armies, as its flexibility assists in defeating the phalanxes piecemeal. It is not so good against barbarian armies - a solid frontline is probably better. But I think I read a post on the RTR forums that historically it would lead to a solid frontline (rear elements would come up to fill gaps), so that's ok.
    I agree, from my limited use of this it seems to work well against some and not others. They used to fill in the gaps and if the front lines couldn't hold they would file back through the gaps in the principes and triarii and remake the front line again.
    I've also used Epaminondas's classic refused flank with phalanxes, that works well even though the historical priniciple on which it was based (that each battleline would incline to the right as each man sought the protection of his neighbour's shield) doesn't apply.

    In MTW the classic Swiss 'steamroller' tactic can work quite well; mass your pike phalanxes, skirmish with crossbows and leave the halberdiers on the flanks, and then just grind forward...as the Burgundians found out, it's very hard to stop!
    Last edited by matteus the inbred; 06-08-2006 at 12:20.
    Support Your Local Pirate

    Ahaaaaaar

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO