Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    I try to use Roman "manipular" (or checkerboard) tactics at least with realism mods like RTR and EB. It works very well against phalanx type armies, as its flexibility assists in defeating the phalanxes piecemeal. It is not so good against barbarian armies - a solid frontline is probably better. But I think I read a post on the RTR forums that historically it would lead to a solid frontline (rear elements would come up to fill gaps), so that's ok.

  2. #2
    Retired Member matteus the inbred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Up a mountain... Ok, London.
    Posts
    739

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    I try to use Roman "manipular" (or checkerboard) tactics at least with realism mods like RTR and EB. It works very well against phalanx type armies, as its flexibility assists in defeating the phalanxes piecemeal. It is not so good against barbarian armies - a solid frontline is probably better. But I think I read a post on the RTR forums that historically it would lead to a solid frontline (rear elements would come up to fill gaps), so that's ok.
    I agree, from my limited use of this it seems to work well against some and not others. They used to fill in the gaps and if the front lines couldn't hold they would file back through the gaps in the principes and triarii and remake the front line again.
    I've also used Epaminondas's classic refused flank with phalanxes, that works well even though the historical priniciple on which it was based (that each battleline would incline to the right as each man sought the protection of his neighbour's shield) doesn't apply.

    In MTW the classic Swiss 'steamroller' tactic can work quite well; mass your pike phalanxes, skirmish with crossbows and leave the halberdiers on the flanks, and then just grind forward...as the Burgundians found out, it's very hard to stop!
    Last edited by matteus the inbred; 06-08-2006 at 12:20.
    Support Your Local Pirate

    Ahaaaaaar

  3. #3
    Senior Member Senior Member naut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    9,103

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    I often use the English "Longbow Tactic", especially with small professional armies against the French or HRE.
    #Hillary4prism

    BD:TW

    Some piously affirm: "The truth is such and such. I know! I see!"
    And hold that everything depends upon having the “right” religion.
    But when one really knows, one has no need of religion. - Mahavyuha Sutra

    Freedom necessarily involves risk. - Alan Watts

  4. #4
    One of the Undutchables Member The Stranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Nowhere...
    Posts
    11,757

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    i ussually use the hammer and anvil tactic. i also use the tactic hannibal used at cannae. i also use the tactics displayed in my RTW tactics thread

    We do not sow.

  5. #5
    It was a trap, after all. Member DukeofSerbia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sombor, Serbia (one day again Kingdom)
    Posts
    1,001

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    With some factions I use historical tactics. My standard tactics is spear infantry in centre, sword infantry on flanks behind spermen, archers are in second line and cavalry for flanking.

    But, in MTW I use haevy cavalry for smashing everything (classic knight charge with catholic factions) except for units which have spear/pike/polearm (not like UM or MS).

    In RTR when I played with Romans I trained only infantry plus mercs cavalry as was in history.
    Watching
    EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00

    Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.

  6. #6
    Legendary Member Taurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kwang Tung
    Posts
    1,985

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    I used to use the Roman "checkerboard" tactic quite a lot in RTW, worked very well too, especially against Phalanx factions and other Romans.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    When i play with English Longbows (MTW)
    the AI, being the French, often uses
    historical tactics with their royal cavalry



    charge them up that hill
    As to what-if, all such thinking is nothing more than simple mental excersises, to see how many details you can come up, but, history is forged by unforseen events, thus, making a what-if impossible.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Stranger
    i ussually use the hammer and anvil tactic. i also use the tactic hannibal used at cannae. i also use the tactics displayed in my RTW tactics thread
    How did you pull off a cannae? i only pulled off a Trasmiene and Gaugamela

  9. #9

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Roman 'manipular' formation is very efficient, and pretty much unbeatable.

  10. #10
    Wardog Beastmaster Member Wardruid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    I live in a pretty quiet place in Baguio city, Benguet, Philippines. Nuff said
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    The British infantry square works well with all anti-cavalry infantry units against cavalry units
    But it's best used in case you don't have any cavalry youself.
    And I strongly recommend not using it if the enemy has artillery
    Last edited by Wardruid; 06-19-2006 at 11:04.
    "For as long as there is man there shall be war."
    -Albert Einstein

  11. #11

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    I try to use Roman "manipular" (or checkerboard) tactics at least with realism mods like RTR and EB. It works very well against phalanx type armies, as its flexibility assists in defeating the phalanxes piecemeal. It is not so good against barbarian armies - a solid frontline is probably better. But I think I read a post on the RTR forums that historically it would lead to a solid frontline (rear elements would come up to fill gaps), so that's ok.
    me too. evertime. this works very well with Darth Formations 13.0 btw.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Anyone used historical tactics in TW games?

    Awesome archer lives near me and we talk a lot. He has books and stuff that have those tactics in them and he uses them and he is really good
    Barbarian Horde Member


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO