By offering Iran nuke technology!![]()
Now if Iran accepts the entire pointless issue of going to war with yet another country will be over.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13165152/
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
By offering Iran nuke technology!![]()
Now if Iran accepts the entire pointless issue of going to war with yet another country will be over.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13165152/
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Texas is Gods country! - SFTS
SFTS =The rest =
If Iran accepts this will be great solution to the problem.It may also start the long path for better relationship between Iran and US.![]()
Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.
They are swimming in oil, why would they need it. I don't thrust them one bit, usa is starting to look like the UN.
Because they don't have much in the way of oil processing capacity?Originally Posted by Fragony
or maybe for bombs.
Sounds like very hopeful improvements in negotiation on both sides. Let's hope it goes well!
Under construction...
"In countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia and Norway, there is no separation of church and state." - HoreTore
If the US supplies Iran with nuclear technology, it becomes politically difficult to justify an attack on Iran in the future on those grounds. It's all about security, and the Neocons' boneheaded sabre-rattling and ignoring of international norms. By rattling their own sabre while remaining strictly within international agreements, the Iranians have got what they wanted, which is security against attack by the US, plus a bonus package of other concessions (they're still adding to the list, knowing they've effectively been given a carte blanche). People may wish to argue if the Bush administration has been good for the US or for the world, but it's certainly been good for Iran.Originally Posted by Fragony
They want to sell the oil, and use nuclear power. More cost efficient and very very profitable in the long run.Originally Posted by Fragony
Texas is Gods country! - SFTS
SFTS =The rest =
Especially considering the fact that in 50 years THERE WILL BE NO OIL LEFT. This is not superstition or rant. It is scientifically proven that if we use oil at the rate we are now we will have no oil by 2050. Chances are it will be sooner as we will most likely increase in the amount of oil the world consumes.
I think we should get our stuff together and just get the heck out of the middle eat. Jesus maybe that’s why they hate us so much? I would to if my kid died from a bomb with USA written on the side of it. We are the moral offenders here not them. We can say we are "freeing them" but to them its just a trade of from one bad leadership to another. Look around the world very few have good leadership it's just the way the world works. We are only using it as an excuse. I say we just get the hell out of there and stopping giving a damn about anything that happens there.
Last edited by -Silent-Pariya; 06-08-2006 at 21:16.
We are there for the oil and in a few instances to fight terrorism. Any other reason is secondary.Originally Posted by Lion_Pariya
On topic though. I don't think they will accept the proposal. The Iranians have made it clear that they will accept no deal that makes them stop suspending uranium. The US has made it clear it will only work with them once they stop suspending. Eh...
Never! It isn't possible! The U.S. is the most evil nation in the history of the world. A modern day Roman empire led by Nero or Caligula!US does the right thing
Things were getting a bit too close to an actual agreement that would avert war, so Bush and co have decided to hot things up again. No guarantees against US aggression, an unrealistically tight deadline, changed criteria, it's Iraq all over again. The badges for Jews story was exposed as a fake a bit quicker than expected thanks to investigative bloggers, but expect another demonising campaign and equation of the President with America (and hence disagreement with lack of patriotism). Are there elections coming up?
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/3016bd02-f7...0779e2340.html
Mr Bolton, who describes himself as “not much a carrots man”, was quick to play down expectations of a dramatic breakthrough and highlighted many of the problems facing the diplomatic process.
“It would be a mistake to think these negotiations are a first step towards some kind of grand bargain [involving US recognition],” he said. “We are only addressing the nuclear issue and stopping their pursuit of nuclear weapons.”
He said US security guarantees for Iran were “not on the table”, and argued instead that regime change could remove a nuclear threat: “Our experience has been that when there is a dramatic change in the life of a country, that’s the most likely point at which they give up nuclear weapons.”
Mr Bolton also voiced doubts that International Atomic Energy Agency inspections would be able to prove that Iran’s programme was purely peaceful, and said that sanctions against Iran if it declined the offer were “a step in the process”. But he also conceded that he could not predict whether the Security Council would back such a measure.All I can say is, keep Britain out of it this time.http://today.reuters.com/news/newsAr...-IRAN-BUSH.xml
CAMP DAVID, Maryland (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran has "weeks not months" to respond to a U.S.-backed offer aimed at containing Iran's nuclear ambitions and said Tehran needs to suspend uranium enrichment.
At a joint news conference with Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Bush said that if Iran does not suspend enrichment, "there must be a consequence."
All I can say is, well George my boy, feel free to just go on over there and punch the Iranian President right in his mouth if you're feelin' froggy. Just don't ask me to come along. I never lost anything in Iran, and I hope to never find anything there either. It is not even on my top ten list of countries that I must visit before I die. If you are feelin' lonesome, take that Zalmy Khalazied fella with you for back up. (Talk about your outsourcing, there is one foreign national on the payroll for you)CAMP DAVID, Maryland (Reuters) - President George W. Bush said on Friday that Iran has "weeks not months" to respond to a U.S.-backed offer aimed at containing Iran's nuclear ambitions and said Tehran needs to suspend uranium enrichment.
At a joint news conference with Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Bush said that if Iran does not suspend enrichment, "there must be a consequence."Have a real nice time, and take Dick with you too.
There is one rock fight that I'd rather not attend.![]()
Rotorgun![]()
Onasander...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.
Bookmarks