Poll: Should knights have a secondary weapon?

Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: Should knights have secondary weapon?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    It was a trap, after all. Member DukeofSerbia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sombor, Serbia (one day again Kingdom)
    Posts
    1,001

    Arrow Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Question: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    My view: YES.

    One of rare good things introduced by Rome Total War was secondary weapon for cavalry armed with spear or lance. I think it would be great that M2 TW continue that tradition.

    Knights used lances when they charged but they were fragile as lances were constructed of wood with metal reinforcements at the breaking points. After initial charge they switched weapon to sword (especially Carolingian sword was used by knights) and later became popular mace (plus special versions of maces like flail, morningstar, holy water sprinkler, and ball and chain).

    What I wrote about knights the same can apply to other heavy cavalry units armed with spear or lance.

    P.S.
    Thanks econ21 for adding polls.


    Last edited by DukeofSerbia; 06-12-2006 at 20:16.
    Watching
    EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00

    Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO