Poll: Should knights have a secondary weapon?

Results 1 to 30 of 48

Thread: Should knights have secondary weapon?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    It was a trap, after all. Member DukeofSerbia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sombor, Serbia (one day again Kingdom)
    Posts
    1,001

    Arrow Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Question: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    My view: YES.

    One of rare good things introduced by Rome Total War was secondary weapon for cavalry armed with spear or lance. I think it would be great that M2 TW continue that tradition.

    Knights used lances when they charged but they were fragile as lances were constructed of wood with metal reinforcements at the breaking points. After initial charge they switched weapon to sword (especially Carolingian sword was used by knights) and later became popular mace (plus special versions of maces like flail, morningstar, holy water sprinkler, and ball and chain).

    What I wrote about knights the same can apply to other heavy cavalry units armed with spear or lance.

    P.S.
    Thanks econ21 for adding polls.


    Last edited by DukeofSerbia; 06-12-2006 at 20:16.
    Watching
    EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00

    Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.

  2. #2
    Just an Oldfart Member Basileus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    In The Kastro
    Posts
    1,213

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    If i remember correctly they had secondary weapons in MTW aswell

  3. #3

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Nope, no secondary weapons in MTW. RTW looked stupid, with the 1.5 patch, cavalry would charge ino another unit without lowering their spears. Then, they wouldnt use their swords most of the time. I just hope that I wouldnt see this in MTW;2

  4. #4
    Grand Patron's Banner Bearer Senior Member Peasant Phill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Somewhere relatively safe, behind some one else, preferably at the back
    Posts
    2,953
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    No they didn't, knights kept using their lances in MTW. Archers did have melee weapons, that's maybe where your confusion came from.

    I agree that cav should have a secondary weapon (as this was so in reality). Actually every unit that had a secondary weapon should have it in the game as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone
    Someone has to watch over the wheat.
    Quote Originally Posted by TinCow
    We've made our walls sufficiently thick that we don't even hear the wet thuds of them bashing their brains against the outer wall and falling as lifeless corpses into our bottomless moat.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member econ21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,651

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    I think units should only have secondary weapons if they are programmed to automatically switch to that weapon where it is appropriate. There's some debate about whether AI cavalry currently do this enough in RTW. And the pike to sword switch in phalanxes was often infuriating. From a player's point of view, to have to micro manage the switch seems ahistorical (the lance is broken - what are they going to do? hit the enemy with stump?) and inefficient (if, as seems likely, the game plays at the same fast speed as RTW).

  6. #6
    Wallachian Battle Antelope Member Vlad The Impala's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    69

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Side-mounted missile launchers for knights!!1

    But seriously, it sounds like a good idea. It looks very odd to see a knight in melee combat trying to poke somone with his lance, it almost looks like a medieval form of snooker.

    Would it be possible to program the knight's AI in such a manner that it thinks 'when engaged in combat, and not moving at charge speed, use secondary weapon'?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Ofcourse they should have.

    Though if they do then they should use it when appropriate, which is something AI never does in RTW/BI which is very strange, after all the missile units can do so it can't be that difficult to program.

    Just one of those things - TW series is great overall but there small and easily corrected mistakes here and there like this one that are very frustraing. I am hoping the game (and the devs!) have matured enough by now not to let that happen again

  8. #8
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Quote Originally Posted by econ21
    I think units should only have secondary weapons if they are programmed to automatically switch to that weapon where it is appropriate. There's some debate about whether AI cavalry currently do this enough in RTW. And the pike to sword switch in phalanxes was often infuriating. From a player's point of view, to have to micro manage the switch seems ahistorical (the lance is broken - what are they going to do? hit the enemy with stump?) and inefficient (if, as seems likely, the game plays at the same fast speed as RTW).
    In RTW cav switches only when being attacked.
    If the player makes them attack, they charge with spears and then go on with spears. If the player types Alt while giving the attack-command, they charge with spears and go on with their secondary weapon.

    I think the only change M2TW needs is to make the switching of weapons the standard and then we´re all happy, should be rather easy to do for CA.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  9. #9
    mostly harmless Member B-Wing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    on the Streets of Rage!
    Posts
    1,070

    Question Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Historically, once a knight's lance broke or was dropped, was he stuck with whatever secondary weapons he had for the duration of the battle? Or did they have back-ups somewhere? I'm assuming a lance is too large to just holster on the side of your horse, so I guess you'd have to just drop it for good if you decided to switch weapons?

    If so, then a more realistic M2TW would make it impossible for knights to use their lances again once they had switched to secondary weapons. What are ya'lls thoughts on that? I'm all for it, but I don't know if that's how it actually worked in real medieval combat.

  10. #10
    Join the ICLADOLLABOJADALLA! Member IrishArmenian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Writing the book, every day...
    Posts
    1,986

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    I think if archers have secondary weapons, so should knights, even moreso. If archers can be programmed to do this, so should knights. And, yes hopefully it doesn't turn out like the phalanxes in Rome.

    "Half of your brain is that of a ten year old and the other half is that of a ten year old that chainsmokes and drinks his liver dead!" --Hagop Beegan

  11. #11
    Believer of Murphy's Law Member Sensei Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    549

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Yes, knights should have secondary weapons. Didn't a knight drop his lance after the initial charge and then switched to a melee weapon afterwards?

    I mean if they didn't, what did they do? Retire from the field?

    It just seems to make more sense.

    Of course, the cav that don't use lances, like Gothic Knights, won't need a second weapon. There is no need to make it overly realistic. If they did that, they should keep the knights who lived but whose horse was killed on the field as Foot Knights .
    Every weapon has evolved from the same basic design, either a rock or a sharp pointy stick.

  12. #12
    Member Member sunsmountain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    414

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    This is a no brainer, unless the knights are not using lances at the charge (which were discarded afterwards), and using their "secondary" sword/mace (gothic!) straight away. Even then it's easy to strap another handheld weapon on your horse in case the first gets broken during the charge or first few (hard) hits.
    in montem soli non loquitur

    (\_/) (>.<) That's what happens with bunnies
    (x.X)(_)(_) who want to achieve world domination!

    becoming is for people who do not will to be

  13. #13
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    I think they should require three graphicscards and a physicscard for the game to run at all, this way they can make the units very high poly and physically calculate every breaking lance, maybe the abundance of calculation power will also be sufficient to simulate the knights´ thoughts and feelings and affect the way they use their weapons.


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  14. #14
    mostly harmless Member B-Wing's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    on the Streets of Rage!
    Posts
    1,070

    Lightbulb Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Hey, I think you're on to something, Husar! A physics card... I've never heard of them before, but somebody should definitely make one!

  15. #15
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Quote Originally Posted by B_Ray
    Hey, I think you're on to something, Husar! A physics card... I've never heard of them before, but somebody should definitely make one!
    http://www.ageia.com/


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  16. #16
    It was a trap, after all. Member DukeofSerbia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sombor, Serbia (one day again Kingdom)
    Posts
    1,001

    Default Re: Should knights have secondary weapon?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei Warrior

    Of course, the cav that don't use lances, like Gothic Knights, won't need a second weapon.
    Even Gothic knights used lance in initial charge, but their secondary weapon was mace (in MTW it was so called "morning star" for devastating armour piercing).
    Watching
    EURO 2008 & Mobile Suit Gundam 00

    Waiting for: Wimbledon 2008.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO