Quote Originally Posted by Dayve
But if this hadn't been so rushed and so much hadn't been hardcoded... EB could have made this game reach its highest potential... So could RTR, but i can't say that there because i got a lifetime ban for breathing on their forums... Or was it because i sneezed?
No, you were banned because you decided that your opinions needed no justification. You were quite content with telling us how much our mod sucks, without giving any suggestions as to how it could be improved. Not to mention the fact that the current RTR dev team is almost completely different to the team that made RTR6.x, so your insults were not only unjustified, but they were directed at the wrong people.

Anyway, so we don't stray too far from the topic at hand: I'd like to see bridges gone from the battlefield, too, but I don't know if it's possible. It has already been suggested that the bridge model simply be made invisible and lowered to the level of the riverbed, but I don't think that will work; anyone who has played a 1.5-based mod will have noticed their troops' tendancy to drown in the water when they try and cross the river by going under the bridge. I think the same thing will happen here if you place the model so low as to make the troops cross the actual water.

It's just one of those things that modders will have to live with. I'd love to see wider rivers, no "automatic bridges" and instead make them buildable in the same way as forts and watchtowers, but none of that is possible.