Shock topic on Canada

[Divinus Arma]

You're acting like a dong, DA.

How so?

I actually looked for a similar U.S. statistic. I'll even bet it is the same.

I just have a problem with the weenie "shocking" by adult men of 6,7,8 yr old baby boys who can't even do simple math yet, let alone firgure out what their peepee is for.


The proper response by a grown man who is asked by a child "touch my weiner" is NO- That is not what we do, little one. It is inappropriate to have adults touch you there. Now let me explain what your little macaroni noodle is actually for.

These bastards are sick sick sick sick sick. And it pisses me off that so many people would find this acceptbale.

BTW, this is scientifically supported statistics, with margin of error and a confidence interval and evrathang.

[GoreBag]

You mean that other statistic you brought up about how 11% of Canadians don't find it immoral? Lack of moral condemnation, then, is no different from support and personal adheration?

How so?

Well, the big text, first off. Secondly, no one really cares if you dug up some wackjob statistic.

Sorry to spoil it for some of you, but sex with children is evil. Closing your eyes to evil does not make it go away.

Oh, come on. I don't even know where to start with that one.

[Phatose]

Seems fairly obvious to me that 11% saying it wasn't immoral doesn't amount to 11% happily endorsing kiddy fiddling. And really, whether or not they're OK with it going on wasn't even on the survey, so scientific or not, the survey's got nothing to say on that front.

One must be very careful with survey results. It's way too easy to read in far more then is actually there.