Who set the cannon? A man did. Who edited out all the other stuff? Men. I don't see where god fits in at all. All the other books contained nothing about creation??!? WOW! You're read them all? All of them! I thought many of them were incomplete or destroyed. Or you're lying.

I guess I can see how you think most of the workd is grasping at straws. Any person who compares the world to a greenhouse can believe anything...

One explanation from one site...
"Question: Where did the light come from before the sun and moon were created?
Answer: The light in the first three days was probably from God himself."

He created the light coming from himself? I have to take my hat off to them managing to shoehorn something to fit the text...

Question: Why should I believe that the Christian Bible's story of creation rather than evolution?

Answer: Creation and evolution are frameworks to think about the past. In the strict sense neither is science since science is done by REPEATABLE experiments in the PRESENT. The Christian version is the only correct one because it is true and is documented from the very beginning. All other creation stories can't be true if the Christian version is true. Either it's true or not. If it's not what historical documentation can be produced to substantiate another view? None as powerful as the Bible!!! Order from chaos conflicts with ALL we know about the real world. The laws of physics, the order in living things, information theory, etc. etc. I recommend the newly published book by Michael Behe (an evolutionist) as a place to help answer the question of order from chaos.

I love the bit "all others can't be true if the Christian version is true... Oh, and the Bible is the Best! (Ignoring it is a rip off of the Torah).

Thus I view this site as extremely low grade "evidence", since it is "we're right, you're wrong" when it comes down to requiring proof.

Why the bible? Loads of other "holy" books around. Why not one of them? And which version of the Bible? There are so many! And let's not get into the inconsistencies...

Since you'd not accept microevolution unless you saw it with your own eyes (made even more difficult as yours would most likely be closed) the evidence required to prove this to you is greater than the proof for any event in the Bible itself.