Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
Who set the cannon? A man did. Who edited out all the other stuff? Men. I don't see where god fits in at all. All the other books contained nothing about creation??!? WOW! You're read them all? All of them! I thought many of them were incomplete or destroyed. Or you're lying.
typo, thanks for pointing that out. I was talking about the book of Enoch.

You have to be careful what you write in some of these threads. I see that some hillbilly evolutionist cannot understand information as a whole, but can only attack tid-bit unintended points. Maybe I should attack the following:

Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
Since you'd not accept microevolution unless you saw it with your own eyes (made even more difficult as yours would most likely be closed) the evidence required to prove this to you is greater than the proof for any event in the Bible itself.
SO, MICROEVOLUTION IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!!!! OH MY!!! DID EVOLUTION SPEED UP TO A RATE THAT CAN BE SEEN HAPPENING WITH THE HUMAN EYE? ARE YOU INSUINATING THAT TIME HAVE CHANGED DREMATICALLY?

I could go on.

Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
I guess I can see how you think most of the workd is grasping at straws. Any person who compares the world to a greenhouse can believe anything....
Until you actually look at the evidence (I better say, go back and click on the links or else you may go off on how I've presented no evidence, no I better post - http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=...=view&page=233 you will continue to open your mouth in ignorance. (Sorry again, I ment speak)

Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
One explanation from one site...
"Question: Where did the light come from before the sun and moon were created?
Answer: The light in the first three days was probably from God himself."

He created the light coming from himself? I have to take my hat off to them managing to shoehorn something to fit the text....
So, God can speak everything into existance, but can't light things up while waiting for the third day? (Another example of tidbit hunting.)

Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
Thus I view this site as extremely low grade "evidence", since it is "we're right, you're wrong" when it comes down to requiring proof.
You never gave the name of the site. Typical. Have you considered the other Creation Science web sites? Have you checked out http://www.irc.org? Or, will you blindly discount them because of your biased unresearched views?

Quote Originally Posted by rory_20_uk
Why the bible? Loads of other "holy" books around. Why not one of them? And which version of the Bible? There are so many! And let's not get into the inconsistencies....
No one that I know of has said, "Only the Bible". Typical again. Try to remember the past posts before you make claims like this. Which version of the Bible? - All of them. There are a few that were translated loosly, but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to discover which ones.