Creation vs Evolution

**crossroad** · 06-19-2006, 18:11

Originally Posted by doc_bean

Algae are responsible for 30-50% of the oxygen production iirc, and you'd have a lot less users due to every animal not on the ark getting killed....

What am I doing here, defending the creationists ? I need to get out of here !!!

Thanks doc. All you're doing is pointing out the possibilities. I appreciate a thinker.

**InsaneApache** · 06-19-2006, 18:16

Originally Posted by crossroad

Thanks doc. All you're doing is pointing out the possibilities. I appreciate a thinker.

Oh the irony.

**doc_bean** · 06-19-2006, 20:07

Originally Posted by crossroad

Thanks doc. All you're doing is pointing out the possibilities. I appreciate a thinker.

Well, I'm certainly not a flood supporter, people tend to forget he needed to take all the plants too, people always forget about the plants...

and a zoo has, like, 0.000001% of all wildlife to be found on earth in it.

**crossroad** · 06-19-2006, 23:30

Originally Posted by doc_bean

Well, I'm certainly not a flood supporter, people tend to forget he needed to take all the plants too, people always forget about the plants...

and a zoo has, like, 0.000001% of all wildlife to be found on earth in it.

The plants did not need to be taken care of.
Zoo's were just an example of man caging up animals.

**doc_bean** · 06-19-2006, 23:42

Originally Posted by crossroad

The plants did not need to be taken care of.
Zoo's were just an example of man caging up animals.

Err.. 99.99999% of land plants would die if they were put under water for a significant amount of time (even a few hours should mess up some of them).

If the glood happened, the animals would have had nothing to eat after the water drew back.

(Yes, yes, unless God magically protected the plants, or magically put them back or whatever.... fanwank )

EDIT: Zain, you know you can put people in an ignore list, don't you ?

**crossroad** · 06-19-2006, 23:58

Originally Posted by doc_bean

Err.. 99.99999% of land plants would die if they were put under water for a significant amount of time (even a few hours should mess up some of them).

If the glood happened, the animals would have had nothing to eat after the water drew back.

(Yes, yes, unless God magically protected the plants, or magically put them back or whatever.... fanwank )

EDIT: Zain, you know you can put people in an ignore list, don't you ?

Seeds, doc, seeds! Read the flood account and you will see that the tops of mountains could have been exposed for months before the ark came to rest on mount Ararat. Plants would have had time to regrow.