Settle down, Tiberius (drat, don't you have ANY bad traits ???),

You are correct about the Parthians, I write and read in haste due to urgent business, and my apologies for my ignorance in this matter.
There can be only one conclusion to us supporting the Seleucid empire against our new neighbours, the Ptolemaic empire, and that is war. They will not take kindly to us openly supporting their enemy and strategically isolating their asian province. If they have any sense, they will attack Byzantion the moment we take it. I would do the same in their place. You are our foremost general, and I cannot believe you do not see these simple strategic facts, and thus I imply that you are pointing, not urging perhaps, but definately pointing towards a path that would definitly lead us into war with the Ptolemaic empire.
Furthermore, the financial worth of the region of Media is negligable, but its strategic value is priceless. The major problem of the Seleucid empire is that it is surrounded by enemies or potential enemies. If they manage to secure their northern border, they will be able to push west with all their strength.
Numbers do not mean much on the battlefield, but the strategic disposition is very interesting here. The Ptolemaic empire is cut in two and has a very long border. The Seleucid empire is beset on all sides, but its only major threat lies to the West. I think the Ptolemaic empire may have a temporary good situation on their hands, but the situation of the Seleucid Empire is improving as well. Frankly, it's a gold piece on its side, it could fall either way. My money, in the long term, is on the Seleucid empire.
OCC: Think Russia in WWII.

Numerius Aureolus, if my co-consul has no objections, I will let the plans continue for now, but I have strong reservations. When I finally have time to survey the situation with a decent map I will make my final decision concerning the Greek cities. Debeltos is a go as far as I am concerned.