I have read several versions of the Bible in their entirety , plus numerous texts that are no longer in the Bible , as well as texts from other religeons The reason I do not support creationism as it is put forward ...ie
AiG teaches that “facts” don’t speak for themselves, but must be interpreted. That is, there aren’t separate sets of “evidences” for evolution and creation—we all deal with the same evidence (we all live on the same earth, have the same fossils, observe the same animals, etc.). The difference lies in how we interpret what we study. The Bible—the “history book of the universe”—provides a reliable, eye-witness account of the beginning of all things, and can be trusted to tell the truth in all areas it touches on. Therefore, we are able to use it to help us make sense of this present world. When properly understood, the “evidence” confirms the biblical account.


is that the Bible is not a reliable eye witness account and cannot be trusted to tell the truth in all areas it touches on because it is contradictory , heavily altered and mis translated many times over .