If you are still aiming to reply, notice it is an exact copy of the quote.... now do you get it?
Right , find any evolutionist text that claims it is an eye witness account , like the quote I took from one of your favourite sites .
Then you might tell me how the bible could possibly , especially regarding creation , be even vaugely described as an eye witness account .
Also since darwins work , and that of many other scientists is available in their own handwriting in archives then how could it be mis-translated ?

A very poor attempt young person .

Creation, the Bible, and a number of other issues that have nothing to do with science.

Therein lies the problem , creationists who wish to push their point of view, especially in education , cannot see that distinction , as is suitably demonstrated in the sites you linked to and whose "information" you repeated in the closed topic .