
Originally Posted by
solypsist
the primary reason would be to remind u.s. citizens that there is war going on. right now americans are completely unaffected by anything and everything that's going on in the middle east, and will continue to be largely indifferent so long as there are no inconveniences. military blunders and setbacks? who cares as long as i can make my sunday leisure drive! but there would definitely be a drive to win or at least reach a conclusion more effectively if people had to "suffer" the term, too.
the american people are not for this war (iraq) but nor are they against it either; not as totally as they could or should be. right now the iraq war is nothing more than a television hobby for americans. imagine if gas had been rationed at the onset of the iraq invasion: do you think the current prevailaing attitude three years later would be indentical to the lackadaisical rhetoric (from all sides) we have today?
Bookmarks