Soon I am going to install Linux on my PC (I'm even considering getting another disk drive just in case my luck with Linux continues...)
I am constantly umming and aahing over which one to plump for, and was wondering if anyone here has any advice.
![]()
Soon I am going to install Linux on my PC (I'm even considering getting another disk drive just in case my luck with Linux continues...)
I am constantly umming and aahing over which one to plump for, and was wondering if anyone here has any advice.
![]()
An enemy that wishes to die for their country is the best sort to face - you both have the same aim in mind.
Science flies you to the moon, religion flies you into buildings.
"If you can't trust the local kleptocrat whom you installed by force and prop up with billions of annual dollars, who can you trust?" Lemur
If you're not a liberal when you're 25, you have no heart. If you're not a conservative by the time you're 35, you have no brain.
The best argument against democracy is a five minute talk with the average voter. Winston Churchill
I'm in the midst of the same dillemma, so hopefully some good info will come along soon.![]()
My father's sole piece of political advice: "Son, politicians are like underwear - to keep them clean, you've got to change them often."
I used OpenSUSE linux for a while as an interim setup. Linux as a whole is stable and fast, OpenSUSE was useful to me as it did what I wanted, networking was hassle free and I even go a little router system setup going after a while.
I can't trully evaluate the OS but all I can say is Good Luck¬
I guess it would be fair to say that some of the major players are debian (or ubuntu), fedora core, and suse.
I haven't had any personal experience with suse, so I can't comment on that.
I've always felt it was a bit over-bloated for a linux distro, though.
debian/ubuntu have the advantage that they probably sport the easiest package update/install/uninstall system (apt). apt seems (to me) the highlight of these distros.
fedora core has yum (the equivalent of apt), but I personally have had a few stability issues with it. Maybe it matured more lately, last significant experience I had with it was in FC3.
Another problem that FC used to have (don't know if it still does) is upgrading from FCx to FCy (y > x). That was absolutely impossible to do up until FC4 or such. Don't know if it's better now.
One of the downsides of debian/ubuntu is that it's a bit of a pain to install it - awfully unfriendly, and it might make you feel a bit lost during the process.
Anyway, you should give a bit of thought to what exactly are you gonna use your linux box for ? Will you care about upgrading packages very often ? Will you care about migrating to a new distro (e.g., FCx to FCx+1), or will you rather just install the new one from scratch ?
Are you only concerned with a friendly installation process ?
Depending on how you feel about these, some of the points I made above may have more or less importance to you.
hope this helps.
Therapy helps, but screaming obscenities is cheaper.
I use and like Mandrake10 with KDE. Although, my distro is a few versions behind (it's now called Mandriva). It's running on a system that's 7yrs old (700mhz Athlon), but acts as an NT4 PDC, a print server, network storage, and a webserver, but can still run some games like Enemy Territory at a decent framerate.
"Don't believe everything you read online."
-Abraham Lincoln
Bookmarks