I'm not going to respond to the utter BS Legio utters here (never thought I'd hear such nonsense from him) because

1)it makes me sick
2)adoption is not the issue of this thread. This thread is about the possible causes of homosexuality, not ethical questions.

Quote Originally Posted by Aenlic
But the main issue for me is, and will remain, that a psychologist shouldn't be drawing conclusions that have a biological basis...
Well, I'm a psychologist and the last paper I wrote came to the conclusion that genetic ablation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 7 in mice leads to anxiolysis but not to severe memory deficits. As this has obviously a biological basis, did I overstep my area of expertise? Should I have left that to "real scientists"?
Fortunately, critique on the basis of not having the right degree is rare among natural scientists. Whether you're a biologist, a psychologist or a bus driver, you're free to suggest explanations for whatever phenomenon you like. What matters is the force of the arguments, not the academic degree.