Hi Pindar,

The reason I asked was because your stance interests me. For the first question your answer summed up in this nugget:
Is this because they were fighting in a war zone? If so, then the consequences of their actions are upon them.
That at least hints that you see the law applies to both equally, 'whats good for the goose is good for the gander'. Tough but fair.

Questions 2 & 3. Given the topic of 3
Quote Originally Posted by Pape
Using the above scenarios. Would you still see it as okay if the law was changed after the capture of those prisoners.
Your answer
Quote Originally Posted by Pindar
One should avoid lands whose legality they question.
What is your backpackers guide to avoiding countries if the law changes and is backdated?