Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Why aren't we talking about this??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Elephant Master Member Conqueror's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    In the Ruins of Europe
    Posts
    1,258

    Default Re: Why aren't we talking about this??

    What would happen if your general dies of old age or is assassinated, leaving your army general-less? Would said army just sit still (when it might be in the middle of enemy territory) untill you can send a family member to fetch it?

    RTW, 167 BC: Rome expels Greek philosophers after the Lex Fannia law is passed. This bans the effete and nasty Greek practice of 'philosophy' in favour of more manly, properly Roman pursuits that don't involve quite so much thinking.

  2. #2
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Why aren't we talking about this??

    This would require recruitable generals, ones different from family members, probably leading normal heavy cav, or equivelant, elite units.

    In short, while its a great idea RTW's engine probably can't handle it, not unless movement points are increased to the point where Generals actually move at a realistic speed.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  3. #3
    Member Member Ambiorix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    53

    Default Re: Why aren't we talking about this??

    Maybe there could just be a way to reduce the movement points of captains by a huge amount, just not make them unable to move?
    Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae


  4. #4
    Guest Dayve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,659

    Default Re: Why aren't we talking about this??

    Clearly the AI would not be able to understand this.

    So the solution which i can't believe nobody has yet mentioned is as follows:

    Captain led armies can move only in provinces that you own, but can never enter enemy/neutral territory without a family member.

  5. #5
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736

    Default Re: Why aren't we talking about this??

    The reason that General led armies are so involving compared to Captain led armies is because captains cannot be given traits but generals can. However, all that you have suggested, in discriminating between captains and generals requires traits, which we cannot do.

    Foot
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO